Implementation of Constant Temperature–Constant Voltage Charging Method with Energy Loss Minimization for Lithium-Ion Batteries

Abstract

Effective charging techniques must consider factors such as charging efficiency, lifecycle, charging time (CT), and battery temperature. Currently, most charging strategies primarily focus on CT and charging losses (CL), overlooking the crucial influence of battery temperature on battery life. Therefore, this study proposes a constant temperature–constant voltage (CT-CV) charging method based on minimizing energy losses. The charging process is primarily divided into three stages. In the first stage, a constant current (CC) charging is implemented using a 2C rate that aims to expedite battery charging but may result in a rapid temperature increase. The second stage involves constant temperature charging, where the charging current is regulated based on battery temperature feedback using a PID controller to maintain a stable battery temperature. The third stage is constant voltage (CV) charging, where a fixed current is applied continuously until the current drops below the charging cutoff current. After completion of the charging process, the charging time can be calculated, and charging losses can be determined by incorporating the battery equivalent circuit model (ECM). To determine the optimal transition time, the paper employs Coulomb counting and the battery ECM, considering both CT and losses to simulate the transition time with minimal CL. This approach achieves optimization of transition points by establishing ECM, measuring internal impedance of the battery, and simulating various charging scenarios, and eliminates the need for multiple actual experiments. Experimental results show that the charging time (CT) should be reduced and the maximum temperature rise (TR) should be reduced under the same average TR condition of the proposed method. At the same CT, the average TR and the maximum TR should both decrease. The charging method proposed in this study exhibits the following advantages: (1) simultaneous consideration of the battery’s equivalent circuit model and charging time; (2) the achieved transition point demonstrates characteristics of minimized charging losses; (3) eliminates the need for multiple experimental iterations.