Abstract
The confiscation of crime proceeds, or the assets confiscation is the root of very basic justice principle, where a crime should not provide benefits to the perpetrator (crime should not pay), or in other words, a person should not take advantage of the illegal activities he or she is doing. Confiscation of assets that are suspected of being unreasonable can be suspected of violating human rights. If the assets owned exceed the amount of their income, the perpetrator is obliged to prove that the assets were obtained legally. The research method used is normative, which examines and examines using laws and regulations. The result of the research is that the application of asset confiscation is not a violation of human rights. Human rights violations occur when it turns out that assets confiscated are not the result of a criminal act of corruption committed by the defendant. Illegal seizure of assets violates human rights which are the property of citizens. Violations of human rights are regulated in the 1945 Constitution and Law Number 39 of 1999 concerning Human Rights.
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Social Science and Human Research
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
