Abstract

Pharmacists' clinical competency is necessary to ensure patient safety and medication optimization. There are many barriers to the implementation of competency assessments and scant literature on their implementation. We aimed to determine if a competency assessment program for hospital pharmacists is feasible, acceptable, and effective. Clinical competency assessments of hospital pharmacists were conducted. During the assessments, pharmacists presented a patient case or completed patient care activities while a leadership team member evaluated them using a competency rubric and provided feedback. A postevaluation electronic survey adapted from validated tools regarding perceptions of program feasibility and acceptability was emailed to the pharmacists following each competency assessment and to evaluators at study conclusion. Feasibility was also measured through reviewing rubrics for completion within the 1.5- to 2-hour assessment timeframe. Effectiveness was captured by comparing results to expected competency levels based on experience. In total, 20 assessments were completed. Fifty percent of assessments required longer than the allotted timeframe. Most participants surveyed found the competency assessments implementable, possible, doable, and easy to use. The majority also approved of the implemented assessments and found them appealing, likable, and welcomed and commented that they aided in professional development. For 50% of the competencies assessed, most participants aligned with competency expectations based on years of experience. The implementation of these competency assessments was found to be feasible and acceptable to hospital pharmacists. The rubric used was found to be moderately effective. Major implementation barriers were related to time constraints and criteria for success. Future work will be done to enhance the program's effectiveness.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.