Abstract

The basis handling procedures of the simplex method are formulated in terms of a “double basis.” The basis is expressed as a matrix product, one of the factors being the basis matrix of the last refactorization. Forward and backward transformations and update are presented for each of two implementations of the double-basis method. The double-basis update is restricted to a matrix of dimension limited by the refactorization frequency and two permutation matrices. This can lead to a saving in storage space and updating time. The cost is that the time for the forward and backward transformations is about double. Computational comparisons of storage and speed are made with the standard simplex method on problems of up to 1,480 constraints. Generally, the double-basis method performs best on larger, denser problems. Density seems to be the more important factor, and the problems with large nonzero growth between refactorizations are the better ones for the double-basis method. Storage saving in the basis inverse representation versus the standard method is as high as 36%, whereas the double-basis run times are 1.2 or more times greater.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.