Implementation gaps of the Portuguese National Health Plan: a stakeholders’ perception analysis

Abstract

Abstract Background The Portuguese National Health Plan (PNS) 2012-2016, extended to 2020, was the strategic health document shaping the direction of intervention within the Health System. The National Institute of Health Doutor Ricardo Jorge (INSA) is the institution responsible for carrying out its final evaluation. To underpin PNS final evaluation a multistep process was designed. Methods A mixed methods study using a convenience sample was implemented to assess stakeholders’ perception about five PNS dimensions: dissemination, communication, implementation, impact, and evaluation. For this purpose, two different tools were used. Semi-structured interviews with former health policy managers were conducted. In addition, an online survey was designed and widely distributed to additional stakeholders. From October 2019 to February 2020, data was collected using two separate instruments. Integral transcriptions of the interviews were made. Qualitative content analysis and quantitative descriptive analysis were used. Results A total of 12 interviews and 179 valid surveys were obtained. Regarding stakeholders’ perception about PNS implementation process, there was an overall positive recognition about the strategic and operational relevance of the PNS, as a common dialogue platform and a tool for health improvements both for health status and health system function in Portugal. Among pointed implementation barriers, management was mentioned as the major constraint, mainly due to shortage of human and financial resources to carry out the recommended interventions within the PNS timeline. Conclusions As part of the evaluation process the research team found relevant gain knowledge of the wider context in which PNS was developed and implemented, based on stakeholders’ perception. Their considerations are important not only to support the definition of the questions and criteria for PNS final evaluation, but also to highlight key issues for the future policy cycle. Key messages