Implementation and reception of a semi-structured resident interview to improve equity

Abstract

Abstract Introduction/Objective To improve equity and inclusion in the residency candidacy interview process, we collaborated with our human resources and graduate medical education colleges to develop standardized interview questions based on best practices reported in corporate and medical literature. These standardized questions were piloted by resident interviewers during the 2023-2024 Pathology residency application cycle in a semi-structured interview format. Methods/Case Report With consultants from the graduate medical education and human resources, we identified favored qualities of expectational candidates (e.g., passion for pathology, interest in program, collaboration, reliability, and compassion) and developed a list of standardized questions with a corresponding answer scoring guide to guide objective assessment of answers for each quality. Residents and fellows (“interviewers”) who volunteer to interview Pathology residency candidates (“candidates”) received training on interviewing best practices, identifying and mitigating bias, and the new semi-structured interview format at the beginning of the interview season. Interviewers were encouraged to use a semi-structured interview format where at least one standardized question is included in addition to their usual ad hoc interview questions and discussions. After the interview season concluded, we surveyed all interviewers (n=39) and candidates (n=90) who participated in this process, for feedback on the semi-structured interview process. Results (if a Case Study enter NA) 31/90 (34%) applicants provided feedback about their interview with 15/29 (52%) applicants agreeing that the semi-structured interview format enhanced their experience. 20/31 (65%) applicants agreed that their impression of Stanford would be positively affected if all interviews were conducted in a semi- structured format. 24/31 (77%) think faculty members should use standardized questions while 17/31 (55%) think residents should use standardized questions in either a semi-structured or structured formats. 17/31 (55%) feel that structured interviews contribute to improving equity. 12/39 (31%) of current residents provided feedback about their interviews. All 12 (100%) respondents used standardized questions in a semi-structured interview format. 10/12 (83%) interviewers think the new format improves our resident interview process. Conclusion Overall, responses from both resident interviewers and applicants support the implementation of semi- structured interviews and the continuation and expansion of this initiative.