Abstract
This study aims to examine that the Corruption Eradication Act, there are difficulties or obstacles in knowing the amount of funds from the results of criminal acts of corruption. Therefore, the Supreme Court issued a guideline in the Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2014 concerning Criminal Additional Substitution in the Case of Corruption Crime. The provisions of the Supreme Court Regulation are intended to complement the weaknesses and shortcomings of the provisions of Article 18 of Law Number 31 of 1999 jo. Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Eradication of Corruption. This study uses normative data with primary and secondary law data sources. Data collection techniques in this study are observation, documentation and literature study. The data collected is analyzed qualitatively. Found that the execution of substitute money based on a decision that has legal force remains contained in Article 9 of the Republic of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation Number 5 of 2014. The results of the auction of state booty, according to Article 9 of the Regulation of the Minister of Finance Number 03 / PMK.06 / 2011 governing the handling of state spoils, are given full power to the service office to deposit into the state treasury as Non-Tax State Revenue in the form of general acceptance of the Prosecutor’s Office within 3 (three) months and can be extended for a maximum of 1 (one) month
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
