Abstract

INTRODUCTION; Intertrochanteric fractures present in a wide variety of patterns that range from simple to complex and may be minimally displaced or widely displaced. Unstable intertrochanteric fracture can fail due to mechanical problems, including loss of fixation, re-fracture, or implant failure. PURPOSE; The aim of this study was to analyse the failures in patients with unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures treated with short Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation (Synthes) METHODS; A retrospective analysis of 97 patients with unstable intertrochanteric factures (AO : 31A2, n = 65 / 67.01 % ; 31-A3: n = 32 /32.9 %) treated with a PFNA in a self-contained district general hospital was conducted. RESULTS; The study included 25 (26%) males and 72 (74%) females with mean age of 82 years. The study period was over 12 months with mean follow up of 11 months (range 6 to 18 months). Intraoperative and postoperative radiographs showed good reduction in 80 patients, acceptable in 12 and poor in 3. Twenty patients had implant related complications, consequently ten patients (10.5 %) had to undergo revision surgery. The reasons of revision surgery were; Implant failures = 8 (8.4%), Helical Blade backing out =1( 1.05 %) and Greater trochanter splintering =1 (1.05%). CONCLUSION ; Implant related complications requiring revision occurred in 10 patients (10.5 %) in early follow up. Of those requiring revision 6 patients had highly unstable 31 A2.3 type fracture. Our study reinforces high failures in unstable intertrochantric fractures. Though Ideal implant remains elusive but Optimum intraoperative reduction and use of augments should be considered to improve outcomes.

Highlights

  • Intertrochanteric fractures present in a wide variety of patterns that range from simple to complex and may be minimally displaced or widely displaced

  • Unstable intertrochanteric fracture can fail due to mechanical problems, including loss of fixation, re fracture, or implant failure

  • The aim of this study was to analyse the failures in patients with unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures treated with Proximal Femoral nail Antirotation (Synthes)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Intertrochanteric fractures present in a wide variety of patterns that range from simple to complex and may be minimally displaced or widely displaced. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyse the failures in patients with unstable intertrochanteric femur fractures treated with Proximal Femoral nail Antirotation (Synthes). CONCLUSION: Implant related complications requiring revision occured in 10.5 % (10) in early term follow up. Of those requiring revision 6 patients had highly unstable 31 A2.3 type fracture. Gangoo SA et al Implant-Related Complications Following Proximal Femoral Nail Antirotation low morbidity and early mobilization. To prevent these complications, the importance of anatomical reduction and medial calcar support to prevent secondary Varus collapse and implant failure has been outlined[3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. The cervical, trochanteric, and sub trochanteric fractures at all three levels in proximal femur increase with age and are greater for women than men[11]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.