Implantologie orale et responsabilité : à propos du choix du dispositif implantaire

Abstract

Dental implants are medical devices designed to create stable, strong, non-iatrogenic and durable anchors in the maxilla or mandible to which a removable or fixed dental prothesis fits, to replace one or more missing teeth. From the 1970s to 2000, these medical devices experienced changes in shape and materials before a consensus was reached on a type of implant that responded to the standard of care. This raises the question of the medical liability of healthcare professionals who use different implant systems in their practices. The present article proposes to highlight the choice of the dental implant by dental practitioner, its design and the materials used, on the field of the medical liability, through a retrospective study of judicial decisions in France. The “Brånemark-type” endosseous cylindrical-conical screw implant is considered as standard of care in France. The dental surgeon has the possibility to use other types of dental implants when the clinical situation strictly contraindicates the use of cylindrical-conical screw implants. In case of litigation, he must be able to justify his choices.