Abstract

Objective: to analyze the in-hospital and long-term outcomes of classical carotid endarterectomy (CEE) in extended atherosclerotic lesions in comparison with the outcomes of this operation in local atherosclerotic plaque (AP).Materials and Methods. This study, which lasted from January 2010 to December 2020, included 148 patients with extended AP and hemodynamically significant internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis. The term “extended” was understood as a hemodynamically significant lesion ≥ 5 cm long. These patients made up Group 1. Group 2 was formed over the same period of time from 632 patients with hemodynamically significant stenosis <5 cm long. In both cohorts, CEE with repair of the reconstruction zone with a diepoxide-treated xenopericardial patch was performed. Long-term follow-up was 71.4 ± 45.6 months.Results. The groups were comparable in terms of frequency of in-hospital complications: death (group 1: 0.67%, n = 1; group 2: 0.5%, n = 3; p = 0.74; OR = 1.42; 95% Cl 0.14-13.6), myocardial infarction (MI) (group 1: 0.67%, n = 1; group 2: 0.5%, n = 3; p = 0.74; OR = 1.42; 95% CI 0.14-13.6), ischemic stroke (group 1: 0%; group 2: 0.5%, n = 3; p = 0.91; OR = 0.6; 95% CI 0.03-11.8), combined endpoint (death + MI + stroke) (group 1: 1.35%, n = 2; group 2: 1.4%, n = 9; p = 0.74; OR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.2-4.43). The groups were also comparable in terms of frequency of long-term complications: death (group 1: 2.0%, n = 3; group 2: 2.05%, n = 13; p = 0.76; OR = 0.98; 95% CI 0.27-3.5), MI (group 1: 2.7%, n = 4; group 2: 2.4%, n = 15; p = 0.95; OR = 1.14; 95% CI 0.37-3.49), ischemic stroke (group 1: 5.4%, n = 8; group 2: 5.2%, n = 33; p = 0.9; OR = 1.03; 95% CI 0.46-2.29), ICA occlusion and restenosis (group 1: 12.8%, n = 19; group 2: 13.3%, n = 84; p = 0.99; OR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.56-1.63), combined endpoint (death + MI + stroke) (group 1: 10.1%, n = 15; group 2: 9.6%, n = 61; p = 0.98; OR = 1.05; 95% CI 0.58-1.91). Analysis of survival graphs revealed no significant intergroup differences for all types of complications (lethal outcome: p = 0.56; MI: p = 0.73; stroke/mini-stroke: p = 0.89; ICA restenosis/occlusion: p = 0.82; combined end point: p = 0.71). Their increase was uniform in both groups. However, more than half of all ICA restenoses and occlusions were visualized in the first 6 months after CEE.Conclusion. Implantation of a long patch (≥ 5 cm) is not characterized by increased incidence of restenosis and all adverse cardiovascular events during in-hospital and long-term follow-up.

Highlights

  • Ключевые слова: каротидная эндартерэктомия, классическая каротидная эндартерэктомия, заплата, рестеноз, протяженное поражение, протяженная атеросклеротическая бляшка, временный шунт, гиперплазия неоинтимы

  • The groups were comparable in terms of frequency of in-hospital complications: death, myocardial infarction (MI), ischemic stroke, combined endpoint

  • Analysis of survival graphs revealed no significant intergroup differences for all types of complications. Their increase was uniform in both groups

Read more

Summary

Хирургические аспекты в трансплантологической клинике

Однако более половины всех рестенозов и окклюзий ВСА было визуализировано в первые 6 месяцев после КЭЭ. Analysis of survival graphs revealed no significant intergroup differences for all types of complications (lethal outcome: p = 0.56; MI: p = 0.73; stroke/mini-stroke: p = 0.89; ICA restenosis/occlusion: p = 0.82; combined end point: p = 0.71) Their increase was uniform in both groups. Однако если со стандартным объемом поражения оба метода зарекомендовали себя как эффективные и безопасные, то при наличии протяженной атеросклеротической бляшки (АСБ) традиционные виды реконструкции не всегда могут быть оправданы [6,7,8].

Материалы и методы
Comparative clinical and anamnestic characteristics of patient groups
Angiographic and perioperative characteristics
Findings
Госпитальные результаты

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.