Abstract

A severely atrophied maxilla presents serious limitations for rehabilitation with osseointegrated implants. This study evaluated the biomechanical and long-term behavior of titanium hybrid-plates in atrophic maxilla rehabilitation with finite elements and probabilistic methodology. A three-dimensional finite element model based on a real clinical case was built to simulate an entirely edentulous maxilla with four plates. Each plate was deformed to become accustomed to the maxilla’s curvature. An axial force of 100 N was applied in the area where the prosthesis was adjusted in each plate. The von Mises stresses were obtained on the plates and principal stresses on maxilla. The difference in stress between the right and left HENGG-1 plates was 3%, while between the two HENGG-2 plates it was 2%, where HENGG means Highly Efficient No Graft Gear. A mean maximum value of 80 MPa in the plates’ region was obtained, which is a lower value than bone resorption stress. A probability cumulative function was computed. Mean fatigue life was 1,819,235 cycles. According to the results of this study, it was possible to conclude that this technique based on titanium hybrid-plates can be considered a viable alternative for atrophic maxilla rehabilitation, although more studies are necessary to corroborate the clinical results.

Highlights

  • IntroductionThe reconstruction of an atrophic maxilla has always been a challenge [1] because of anatomical and clinical factors due to the serious limitations for conventional implant placement [2]

  • The reconstruction of an atrophic maxilla has always been a challenge [1] because of anatomical and clinical factors due to the serious limitations for conventional implant placement [2].These limitations are related to the amount of bone, which remains insufficient for the conventional placement of a dental implant [3]

  • According to the results of this study, it was possible to conclude that this technique based on titanium hybrid-plates can be considered a viable alternative for atrophic maxilla rehabilitation, more studies are necessary to corroborate the clinical results

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The reconstruction of an atrophic maxilla has always been a challenge [1] because of anatomical and clinical factors due to the serious limitations for conventional implant placement [2]. These limitations are related to the amount of bone, which remains insufficient for the conventional placement of a dental implant [3]. The maxillary bone volume has been classified, among other authors, by Cawood and Howel in five grades (I to V). Grades IV and V are considered as extreme atrophies [4]. The most common alternatives in atrophic maxilla rehabilitation are bone grafting [5], pterygoid [6] or zygomatic implants [7], bone regeneration (with or without mesh) [8,9], and short implants [10].

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call