Imperatives of Efficient Use of Land and Resource Potential of the Agricultural Enterprises of Ukraine

Igor Vinichenko,Nataliia Pochernina,Yurii Prus,Oleksandr Sereda,Serhii Tkachenko

doi:10.48077/scihor.24(4).2021.72-89

Abstract

The article considers the institutionalization of land relations and the imperatives of efficient use of land and resource potential of agricultural enterprises of Ukraine. Within the institutionalization of land relations, the methodical approach to complex estimation of effective use of land and resource potential of agricultural enterprises is substantiated, by definition of an integral indicator of efficiency (quantitative and qualitative characteristics of involved resources, productivity and efficiency) of basic kinds of activity of economic entities on agricultural lands. Indicators of transparency in the assessment of land and resource potential and indicators of land policy according to the level of their use in agriculture are proposed. Comprehensive criteria for assessing the components of the efficiency of the use of land and resource potential of agricultural enterprises are presented. The amount of rent for land shares and the amount of fertilizer application per 1 ha of sown area of agricultural enterprises of Ukraine are analyzed. The productive capacity of natural and potential yields for grain and legumes (excluding corn for grain) in Ukraine has been determined. The normative monetary value of 1 ha of arable land in rural areas is calculated on average for one region of Ukraine, adjusted for the natural yield of cereals and legumes, without taking into account the application of fertilizers. The forecast level of technical, social and economic efficiency of the use of land and resource potential of agricultural enterprises is presented

Highlights

Institutional changes in land relations in the conditions of uncertainty in the development of agricultural entities require comprehensive characterization in the system of targeted land use and differentiation of the functional purpose of land and resources potential
The proposed indicators are an innovative lever for assessing the state of land resources at the local level, which can be used by local governments of united territorial communities, interested investors to identify conflicts in sectoral land use of agriculture and increase the investment attractiveness of agricultural enterprises in agricultural market
We propose to calculate the yield ratio in the classical way: the numerator is the yield obtained in the production of cereals, and the denominator is the normative monetary value of 1 ha of arable land, according to formula (1) [19]: CCpp where: Cp – profitability ratio, %; ΔP – profitability obtained in production activities; NMV – normative monetary valuation of 1 ha of land resource, USD

Summary

Introduction

Institutional changes in land relations in the conditions of uncertainty in the development of agricultural entities require comprehensive characterization in the system of targeted land use and differentiation of the functional purpose of land and resources potential. As part of the intensification of the initiative of territorial communities on their possible development and ability to independently solve the problem of the mobilization of internal reserves, in relation to the strategic imperatives of efficient use of land and resource potential, the land use within agglomerations of large cities sometimes ends with the futility To solve this problem, along with theoretical and methodological aspects of institutional support of land and resource potential of agricultural enterprises, it is necessary to distinguish between qualitative and quantitative assessment of efficient and rational land use, taking into account the growing social orientation of economic entities to economic development. This is a guarantee of improving the quality of life of the rural population, preserving the natural environment in the spatial location of agricultural enterprises, which play a leading role in ensuring sustainable development of the village as a whole

Methods

Results

Conclusion