Abstract
Percutaneous ventricular assist device (PVAD) use in balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) has been performed sporadically. The PVAD used was TandemHeart. A few cases were reported using Impella 2.5 device. We report the first case of Impella CP-assisted BAV. The use of PVAD has been contraindicated in severe aortic stenosis (AS). However, the various benefits of PVAD, including circulatory support and minimizing interruption of blood flow during balloon inflation, made its use attractive in high-risk BAV. We recommend that severe AS no more stays as a contraindication to the use of PVADs.<Learning objective: There are various benefits of using percutaneous ventricular assist devices (PVADs) during high-risk balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV). Benefits, including circulatory support and minimizing interruption of blood flow during balloon inflation, made its use attractive in high-risk BAV. We present the good outcome of using Impella CP device in one case of high-risk BAV. We recommend that severe aortic stenosis no more stays as a contraindication to the use of PVADs.>
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
