Abstract
Despite the aggressive efforts by the legislators and the moralists to demonize local brew in Kenya, Chang’aa and busaa have withstood all the suppression and they remain the most preferred alcoholic drinks for rural and lower class citizens. This study made an inquiry into the challenges facing the implementation of local brew policies, with specific focus on the Alcoholic Drinks Control Act, 2010 and the County Alcoholic Drinks Control Act which is currently being adopted by the counties across Kenya. The study area was unique in the sense that it strategically links Kenya and Uganda and there are deep intricacies in relation to cross border relations. No such study has been conducted in a local community along the Kenya-Uganda border with a long history of local brewing in the western parts of Kenya. The study data was collected from 60 local brewers using questionnaires. Personal interviews were used in gathering data from key informants that included 10 police officers and 10 national administrators. The study found major pitfalls both in the design and implementation of the policies on local brew. The study revealed that the major policy implementation challenges are related to influence from traditions, skewed implementation and coordination measures, inadequate implementation resources, poor conduct of the implementing officers, poor court practices and increased smuggling of sub-standard brew from Uganda. The police are some of the beneficiaries of local brew illegalization efforts since they fleece money from the gullible local brewers. The study recommended that local brew should be legalized and standardized because the current prohibition efforts only benefit Ugandan economy and promote the growth of the black market at the Kenya-Uganda border. There is a need for more investment on the socioeconomic aspects of life that more often lure people to local brewing. The study findings challenge the government to consider meditating upon the realities on the ground before prohibiting local brew. Keywords: Actualization, Legislation, Policy, Public Participation DOI: 10.7176/JLPG/109-08 Publication date: May 31 st 2021
Highlights
The problem of excessive consumption of local brew in Kenya has been historical, and it continues to haunt the country since it is considered as a source of many social problems
The purpose of this study was to identify the main challenges that make the realization of legislation on local brew an illusion in Kenya, with Teso South Sub-County, a place in the Kenya-Uganda border that is long considered as a hub of local beer, as a study area
For policy to be successful, there must be a serious commitment of recourses, policy actors equipped with relevant information concerning the policy as well as the political support of the policy implementation process (Bressers & O’Toole, 2005)
Summary
The problem of excessive consumption of local brew in Kenya has been historical, and it continues to haunt the country since it is considered as a source of many social problems. Since the 1980s, legislation efforts have intensified with the government establishing statutes to govern the manufacture, sale, and consumption of alcohol and other local brew These include the Chang’aa Prohibition Act 1980, the Liquor Licensing Act 1986, the Traditional Liquor Licensing Act 1991, and Alcoholic Drinks Control Act, 2010. Besides these legislations, the government established the National Agency for the Campaign Against Drug Abuse (NACADA) in March 2001, “to coordinate the activities of individuals and organizations in the campaign against the excessive use of local and commercial brew”. The purpose of this study was to identify the main challenges that make the realization of legislation on local brew an illusion in Kenya, with Teso South Sub-County, a place in the Kenya-Uganda border that is long considered as a hub of local beer, as a study area
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.