Abstract

Learning the causal relation between actions and their outcomes (AO learning) is critical for goal-directed behavior when actions are guided by desire for the outcome. This can be contrasted with habits that are acquired by reinforcement and primed by prevailing stimuli, in which causal learning plays no part. Recently, we demonstrated that goal-directed actions are impaired in schizophrenia; however, whether this deficit exists alongside impairments in habit or reinforcement learning is unknown. The present study distinguished deficits in causal learning from reinforcement learning in schizophrenia. We tested people with schizophrenia (SZ, n = 25) and healthy adults (HA, n = 25) in a vending machine task. Participants learned two action–outcome contingencies (e.g., push left to get a chocolate M&M, push right to get a cracker), and they also learned one contingency was degraded by delivery of noncontingent outcomes (e.g., free M&Ms), as well as changes in value by outcome devaluation. Both groups learned the best action to obtain rewards; however, SZ did not distinguish the more causal action when one AO contingency was degraded. Moreover, action selection in SZ was insensitive to changes in outcome value unless feedback was provided, and this was related to the deficit in AO learning. The failure to encode the causal relation between action and outcome in schizophrenia occurred without any apparent deficit in reinforcement learning. This implies that poor goal-directed behavior in schizophrenia cannot be explained by a more primary deficit in reward learning such as insensitivity to reward value or reward prediction errors.

Highlights

  • The capacity to detect the causal effects of our actions is a critical prerequisite of goal-directed learning, allowing our actions to be regulated by their consequences[1,2,3,4]

  • When actions are goal-directed, they are guided by desire for the outcome, as well as the belief that a particular action will cause that outcome. This excludes another class of adaptive behavior that is not mediated by anticipation of the goal but instead learned by a process of gradual reinforcement and primed by contextual stimuli or recent response history; that is, habit learning or reinforcement learning[5,6,7,8]

  • If schizophrenia is Morris et al Translational Psychiatry (2018)8:54 associated with a specific impairment in goal-directed learning, procedures that distinguish the influence of causality from reward value should selectively distinguish this deficit

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The capacity to detect the causal effects of our actions is a critical prerequisite of goal-directed learning, allowing our actions to be regulated by their consequences[1,2,3,4]. After training on these two action–outcome (AO) relationships, one of the outcomes was devalued (e.g., M&Ms were shown to be infested by cockroaches). The effect of this devaluation on participants’ behavior was tested. If schizophrenia is Morris et al Translational Psychiatry (2018)8:54 associated with a specific impairment in goal-directed learning, procedures that distinguish the influence of causality from reward value should selectively distinguish this deficit.

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call