Abstract

The hippocampus plays a central role in long-term memory formation, and different hippocampal network states are thought to have different functions in this process. These network states are controlled by neuromodulatory inputs, including the cholinergic input from the medial septum. Here, we used optogenetic stimulation of septal cholinergic neurons to understand how cholinergic activity affects different stages of spatial memory formation in a reward-based navigation task in mice. We found that optogenetic stimulation of septal cholinergic neurons (1) impaired memory formation when activated at goal location but not during navigation, (2) reduced sharp wave ripple (SWR) incidence at goal location, and (3) reduced SWR incidence and enhanced theta-gamma oscillations during sleep. These results underscore the importance of appropriate timing of cholinergic input in long-term memory formation, which might help explain the limited success of cholinesterase inhibitor drugs in treating memory impairment in Alzheimer's disease.

Highlights

  • The role of the neuromodulator acetylcholine (ACh) in learning and memory is debated

  • We first confirmed the expression of ChR2 in medial septum (MS) cholinergic neurons by performing double immunostaining for choline-acetyl transferase (ChAT) and YFP (Figure 1A)

  • We investigated the effects of stimulating MS cholinergic neurons on learning and hippocampal local field potential (LFP) when delivered at different phases of an appetitively motivated spatial memory task

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The role of the neuromodulator acetylcholine (ACh) in learning and memory is debated. Phase-amplitude-coupled theta (5–12 Hz)-gamma (30–100 Hz) oscillations (Csicsvari et al, 2003) occur during exploratory behaviors, while largeamplitude sharp waves combined with high-frequency ripples (sharp wave ripples [SWRs]) (O’Keefe and Nadel, 1978; Csicsvari et al, 2000) occur during immobility and slow-wave sleep These two network states are mutually exclusive (O’Keefe and Nadel, 1978; Buzsaki, 1986; Csicsvari et al, 2000), and it was suggested that memory encoding is associated with theta/gamma oscillations while memory consolidation relies on SWR activity (O’Neill et al, 2010; Colgin, 2013)

Objectives
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call