Abstract

Certain types of violent offending are often accompanied by evidence of personality disorders (PDs), a range of heterogeneous conditions characterized by disinhibited behaviours that are generally described as impulsive. The tasks previously used to show impulsivity deficits experimentally (in borderline personality disorder, BPD) have required participants to inhibit previously rewarded responses. To date, no research has examined the inhibition of responding based on Pavlovian stimulus-stimulus contingencies, formally "conditioned inhibition" (CI), in PDs. The present study used a computer-based task to measure excitatory and inhibitory learning within the same CI procedure in offenders recruited from the "personality disorder" and the "dangerous and severe personality disorder" units of a high-security psychiatric hospital. These offenders showed a striking and statistically significant change in the expression of inhibitory learning in a highly controlled procedure: The contextual information provided by conditioned inhibitors had virtually no effect on their prepotent associations. Moreover, this difference was not obviously attributable to nonspecific cognitive or motivational factors. Impaired CI would reduce the ability to learn to control associative triggers and so could provide an explanation of some types of offending behaviour.

Highlights

  • Certain types of violent offending are often accompanied by evidence of personality disorders (PDs)

  • Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 2334-2351 Excitatory training: In the initial training stage participants learned a simple discrimination between the reinforced A and C and the nonreinforced U and V; this provided a measure of simple excitatory learning in the two groups

  • There were no differences in excitatory learning scores, or in inhibitory learning scores, between offenders on (n=14) and off (n=10) medication: for antidepressants, largest t(22)=1.11, p=0.28; for anxiolytics, largest t(22)=0.78, p=0.44; for antidepressants and/or anxiolytics, largest t(22)=1.27, p=0.22; for antipsychotics, largest t(22)=1.54, p=0.14; for any form of psychotropic medication, largest t(22)=1.51, p=0.15. This experiment provided evidence that, while conditioned inhibition’ (CI) was clearly demonstrated in the community control participants, it was effectively absent in a group of offenders, in the Dangerous and Severe Personality Disorder (DSPD) subgroup

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Certain types of violent offending are often accompanied by evidence of personality disorders (PDs). Clinical accounts of antisocial (ASPD) and borderline (BPD) offenders confirm that impulsive and violent behaviours are typical. The personality profile of offenders is not clear-cut, and there is a high degree of comorbidity between ASPD and BPD. Another psychological profile often identified with violent offenders is psychopathy (Hare, 1991). This condition shows clear overlap with ASPD (Blackburn & Coid, 1998; Coid & Ullrich, 2010; Hare, Hart & Harpur, 1991; Hart & Hare, 1996; Kosson, Lorenz & Newman, 2006). Both psychopathy and ASPD are characterized by a disinhibited lifestyle and a tendency to transgress social norms and legal rules

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call