Abstract
BackgroundDespite its high prevalence and associated disability, the neural correlates of emotion processing in patients with functional (psychogenic) tremor (FT), the most common functional movement disorder, remain poorly understood.MethodsIn this cross sectional functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study at 4T, 27 subjects with FT, 16 with essential tremor (ET), and 25 healthy controls (HCs) underwent a finger-tapping motor task, a basic-emotion task, and an intense-emotion task to probe motor and emotion circuitries. Anatomical and functional MRI data were processed with FSL (FMRIB Software Library) and AFNI (Analysis of Functional Neuroimages), followed by seed-to-seed connectivity analyses using anatomical regions defined from the Harvard-Oxford subcortical atlas; all analyses were corrected for multiple comparisons.ResultsAfter controlling for depression scores and correcting for multiple comparisons, the FT group showed increased activation in the right cerebellum compared to ET during the motor task; and increased activation in the paracingulate gyrus and left Heschl's gyrus compared with HC with decreased activation in the right precentral gyrus compared with ET during the basic-emotion task. No significant differences were found after adjusting for multiple comparisons during the intense-emotion task but increase in connectivity between the left amygdala and left middle frontal gyrus survived corrections in the FT subjects during this task, compared to HC.ConclusionsIn response to emotional stimuli, functional tremor is associated with alterations in activation and functional connectivity in networks involved in emotion processing and theory of mind. These findings may be relevant to the pathophysiology of functional movement disorders.
Highlights
Functional tremor (FT), the most common functional movement disorder, is diagnosed by confirming entrainment or full suppressibility of the oscillatory activity, distractibility, co-activation or co-contraction sign, pause of tremor during contralateral ballistic movements, and variability in tremor frequency, axis, and/or topographical distribution (Espay and Lang, 2015)
Depression (HAM-D, 14.9 ± 10.1 vs. 2.8 ± 5.2 [Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) score 14–18 = moderate depression]) and anxiety scores (HAM-A, 14.6 ± 11.7 vs. 3.2 ± 5.9 [Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) score 14–17 = mild anxiety]) were significantly higher in the functional (psychogenic) tremor (FT) group compared to essential tremor (ET)
Two small regions in the left precentral gyrus were found to have reduced activation in FT patients when compared with healthy controls (HCs) in the right tap greater than left tap contrast (Z > 2.3, p < 0.05 corrected), but this difference did not pass correction for multiple comparison when controlling for HAM-D
Summary
Functional (psychogenic) tremor (FT), the most common functional movement disorder, is diagnosed by confirming entrainment or full suppressibility of the oscillatory activity, distractibility, co-activation or co-contraction sign, pause of tremor during contralateral ballistic movements, and variability in tremor frequency, axis, and/or topographical distribution (Espay and Lang, 2015). Recent functional neuroimaging studies of patients with functional movement disorders have demonstrated alterations in regional cerebral blood flow during simple motor tasks (Schrag et al, 2013) or in brain activation of the cerebellar vermis, posterior cingulate cortex, and hippocampus on isometric precision-grip contraction tasks (Blakemore et al, 2016) as well as in brain activation of the right amygdala on simple emotional stimuli (n = 10). Despite its high prevalence and associated disability, the neural correlates of emotion processing in patients with functional (psychogenic) tremor (FT), the most common functional movement disorder, remain poorly understood. Conclusions: In response to emotional stimuli, functional tremor is associated with alterations in activation and functional connectivity in networks involved in emotion processing and theory of mind. These findings may be relevant to the pathophysiology of functional movement disorders
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
