Abstract

Detecting causal relationships between actions and their outcomes is fundamental to guiding goal-directed behaviour. The ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) has been extensively implicated in computing these environmental contingencies, via animal lesion models and human neuroimaging. However, whether the vmPFC is critical for contingency learning, and whether it can occur without subjective awareness of those contingencies, has not been established. To address this, we measured response adaption to contingency and subjective awareness of action-outcome relationships in individuals with vmPFC lesions and healthy elderly subjects. We showed that in both vmPFC damage and ageing, successful behavioural adaptation to variations in action-outcome contingencies was maintained, but subjective awareness of these contingencies was reduced. These results highlight two contexts where performance and awareness have been dissociated, and show that learning response-outcome contingencies to guide behaviour can occur without subjective awareness. Preserved responding in the vmPFC group suggests that this region is not critical for computing action-outcome contingencies to guide behaviour. In contrast, our findings highlight a critical role for the vmPFC in supporting awareness, or metacognitive ability, during learning. We further advance the hypothesis that responding to changing environmental contingencies, whilst simultaneously maintaining conscious awareness of those statistical regularities, is a form of dual-tasking that is impaired in ageing due to reduced prefrontal function.

Highlights

  • The ability to detect causal relationships between actions and their outcomes is fundamental to adaptive behaviour

  • Our findings suggest that ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC) lesions are not associated with deleterious effects on instrumental response rates, but they are linked to impaired causal awareness of contingencies between actions and outcomes

  • In healthy ageing, we observed intact response rates, but awareness of causality was impaired for non-contingent probabilities

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The ability to detect causal relationships between actions and their outcomes is fundamental to adaptive behaviour. Goal-directed behaviour, is not exclusively driven by the value attached to action-outcome associations; it requires computation of the likelihood that an outcome will occur in the presence or absence of a given action (Baum, 1973; Dickinson and Balleine, 1994; Schultz, 2015). This casual relationship is formalised as contingency (Rescorla, 1967). The difference between the two probabilities, denoted by ΔP, is expressed as ΔP = P(O|A)–P(O|~A) This probability expresses the overall strength of the action-outcome relationship (Liljeholm et al, 2011)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call