Abstract

Centralized management of large carnivore populations in rural and remote landscapes used by local people often leads to conflicts between the objectives of wildlife conservation and rural development. We tested the hypothesis that the presence of wolves indirectly reduces landowner revenues from traditional small game hunting, and that landowner revenues are more variable closer to wolf territories. The assumed mechanism is that hunters fear that their economically and culturally valuable hunting dogs may be killed by wolves, which results in reduced hunting, and thus reduced revenues for landowners where and when wolves occur. To determine the effect of wolf presence on revenues from sport hunting, we obtained data from 1990 to 2009 on income from small game management areas, in Hedmark and Oppland Counties in Norway, as well as locations of wolf territories. Small game management areas experienced increased sport hunting revenue with increasing distance to the closest wolf territory. Also, inter-annual variation in revenue decreased with increasing distance from wolf territories. Thus, wolf presence may reduce landowners’ revenues from small game hunting, and cause higher economic variability in rural communities. It is important to note that while the economic impacts of wolves may be compensated where governments have the will and the economic resources, the impacts on the lifestyles of rural people (e.g. hunter’s fear of losing prized dogs to wolves) will remain controversial.

Highlights

  • IntroductionLarge carnivores such as wolves (Canis lupus) constitute an important component of Holarctic environments, where they influence both other species and ecosystem functions

  • Management of large mammal populations where human communities use extensive rural or remote landscapes often leads to conflicts between the objectives of centralizedElectronic supplementary material The online version of this article contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.On one hand, large carnivores such as wolves (Canis lupus) constitute an important component of Holarctic environments, where they influence both other species and ecosystem functions

  • We tested for an effect of distance from nearest wolf territory on revenues from small game hunting

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Large carnivores such as wolves (Canis lupus) constitute an important component of Holarctic environments, where they influence both other species and ecosystem functions. Wolves may limit large herbivore populations through predation, and limit populations of mesopredators (e.g. red fox Vulpes vulpes), through intraguild predation (Ripple et al 2014a). Trophic cascades apparently caused by the impacts of wolves on cervid densities (Ripple and Beschta 2012a) have been argued to 87 Page 2 of 9. It can be argued that trophic interactions are more complex, and that wolf-induced trophic cascades may not be widespread, and maybe only an effect traceable in the Yellowstone ecosystem (Allen et al 2017a; Kuijper et al 2016; Mech 2012; Mech 2017; Peterson et al 2014). To cite Mech (2012) “The wolf is neither a saint nor a sinner except to those who want to make it so”

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call