Abstract

Urban development is rapidly expanding across the globe and is a major driver of environmental change. Despite considerable improvements in our understanding of how species richness responds to urbanisation, there is still insufficient knowledge of how other measures of assemblage composition and structure respond to urban development. Functional diversity metrics provide a useful approach for quantifying ecological function. We compare avian functional diversity in 25 urban areas, located across the globe, with paired non-urban assemblages using a database of 27 functional traits that capture variation in resource use (amount and type of resources and how they are acquired) across the 529 species occurring across these assemblages. Using three standard functional diversity metrics (FD, MNTD and convex hull) we quantify observed functional diversity and, using standardized effect sizes, how this diverges from that expected under random community assembly null models. We use regression trees to investigate whether human population density, amount of vegetation and city size (spatial extent of urban land), bio-region and use of semi-natural or agricultural assemblages as a baseline modulate the effect of urbanisation on functional diversity. Our analyses suggest that observed functional diversity of urban avian assemblages is not consistently different from that of non-urban assemblages. After accounting for species richness avian functional diversity is higher in cities than areas of semi-natural habitat. This creates a paradox as species responses to urban development are determined by their ecological traits, which should generate assemblages clustered within a narrow range of trait space. Greater habitat diversity within cities compared to semi-natural areas dominated by a single habitat may enhance functional diversity in cities and explain this paradox. Regression trees further suggest that smaller urban areas, lower human population densities and increased vegetation all enhance the functional diversity of urban areas. A city’s attributes can thus influence the functional diversity of its biological assemblages, and their associated ecological functions. This has important implications for the debate regarding how we should grow the world’s cities whilst maintaining their ecological function.

Highlights

  • Urban land cover is predicted to triple in extent from 2000 to 2030, with nine-fold rates of increase in some biodiversity hotspots (Seto et al, 2012)

  • Our data comprise a total of 529 species, of which 141 species occurred at sites in the Western Palearctic, 199 species in North America and 207 in South America

  • A greater number of species were restricted to non-urban areas than urban ones

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Urban land cover is predicted to triple in extent from 2000 to 2030, with nine-fold rates of increase in some biodiversity hotspots (Seto et al, 2012). Urbanization drives significant habitat loss and fragmentation, pollution (chemical, noise, light, and heat) and other changes in selection pressures that radically restructure biotic communities (Grimm et al, 2008; Pautasso et al, 2011). At local scales this restructuring typically generates a unimodal pattern in native species richness along urbanization gradients, with richness peaking at intermediate levels of urbanization intensity Analyses conducted at city scale suggest that cities typically contain fewer species than equivalent sized rural areas, but such studies are much rarer than those focusing on local scale responses to urbanization and there is limited understanding of factors driving variation in biodiversity across cities (Norton et al, 2016; Lepczyk et al, 2017)

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call