Abstract

The paper gives a directive toward assessment of resilience of building designed to comply the nearly zero energy standard in the current conditions and also points out the gap in the existing approach for evaluating the effect that the climate changes could have on building material behavior and systems degradation. A method is introduced for evaluating how the variation of energy need and in-situ production can modify the energy balance under the representative concentration pathway of the intermediate (RCP 4.5) and the worst emissions scenario (RCP 8.5). The results for a case study indicate that under RCP 4.5 scenario, the polyethylene foam insulation has the higher increment of heating demand (+ 9.8%) instead the cooling demand decreases by −4.2% (RCP 8.5) and −4.6% (RCP 4.5). The innovative materials are less affected (<1%) by temperature variations. On the other hand, the PV system degradation causes the reduction of in-situ production from −6.9% (RCP 8.5) and −8.0% (RCP 4.5). However, the analysis of the hourly balance suggests that the building resilience would be not compromised. Indeed, by evaluating the ratio between the self-consumption and the total request, it increases compared to the current conditions of around 2%.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.