Abstract
Evolution of ice sheets contribute to sea-level change globally by exchanging mass with the ocean, and regionally by causing the solid Earth deformation and perturbation of the Earth’s rotation and gravitational field, so-called “gravitational, rotational and deformational (GRD) effects”. In the last decade, much work has been done to establish the importance of coupling GRD effects particularly in modeling of marine-based ice sheets (e.g., West Antarctic Ice Sheet; WAIS) to capture the interactions between ice sheets, sea level and the solid Earth at the grounding lines. However, coupling of GRD effects has not yet been done widely within the ice-sheet modeling community; for example, GRD effects were not included in any of the ice sheet models that contributed to the most recent recent ice-sheet model intercomparison through 2100 (Ice Sheet Model Intercomparison Project for CMIP6: ISMIP6-2100; Serrousi et al., 2020) cited by the latest IPCC AR6 report.In this work, we couple the US Department of Energy’s MPAS-Albany Land Ice model (which was one of the models that participated in the ISMIP6-2100 project) to a 1D sea-level model and perform coupled simulations of Antarctica under the new ISMIP6-2300 protocol in which climate forcing is extended beyond 2100 to 2300. Comparing to the standalone ice-sheet simulations with fix bed topography without GRD effects, the results from our coupled simulations show multi-decadal to centennial-scale delays in the retreat of the Thwaites glacier in the West Antarctica. Our results further suggest that the strength of the negative feedback of sea-level changes on the WAIS retreat becomes weaker as the strength of the applied forcing increases, implying the pertinence of our commitment to limiting greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, within our coupled ice sheet-sea level modeling frame, we introduce a new workflow work in which the ISMIP6 protocol-provided ocean thermal forcing is re-extrapolated based on the updated ocean bathymetry. Our preliminary results indicate that bedrock uplift due to ice mass loss can block the bottom warm ocean, providing additional negative feedback, but also can block cold water when/if the vertical ocean temperature profile gets inverted due to climate change (e.g., as represented in the UKESM model - SSP585 scenario results).
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.