Impacts of pre-treatment technologies and co-products on greenhouse gas emissions and energy use of lignocellulosic ethanol production
Impacts of pre-treatment technologies and co-products on greenhouse gas emissions and energy use of lignocellulosic ethanol production
672
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.03.002
- May 12, 2006
- Journal of Cleaner Production
191
- 10.1016/j.biombioe.2003.07.007
- Jul 23, 2004
- Biomass and Bioenergy
97
- 10.1002/bbb.133
- Mar 1, 2009
- Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
72
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.003
- Jun 9, 2013
- Journal of Cleaner Production
718
- 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.06.125
- Jul 10, 2010
- Bioresource Technology
216
- 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2010.05.005
- May 28, 2010
- Biotechnology Advances
120
- 10.1007/s11367-010-0177-2
- Mar 31, 2010
- The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment
154
- 10.1021/es100186h
- Jun 7, 2010
- Environmental Science & Technology
110
- 10.1111/j.1365-2621.1990.tb01619.x
- Jul 1, 1990
- Journal of Food Science
22
- 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01123.x
- Sep 8, 2011
- GCB Bioenergy
- Research Article
12
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.03.113
- Apr 5, 2015
- Applied Energy
Integrated economic and life cycle assessment of thermochemical production of bioethanol to reduce production cost by exploiting excess of greenhouse gas savings
- Research Article
115
- 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.08.072
- Sep 28, 2016
- Energy Conversion and Management
An overview of engine durability and compatibility using biodiesel–bioethanol–diesel blends in compression-ignition engines
- Book Chapter
6
- 10.1007/978-3-319-30205-8_22
- Jan 1, 2016
Within the framework of sustainable development, a quadruple transition (demographic, food, energetic and environmental) is necessary. The integrated biomass valorization, including the production of biofuels via the biorefinery concept lies at the cross section of these global challenges. Biofuels production competes for water and land use with respect to feed and food production. Securing these resources in an uncertain geopolitical environment is a strategic issue for many countries. It also has favorable (climate change mitigation) and adverse implications (fertilizers consumption, local pollutions). Therefore, the topic leads to huge political and economic debates at national and international scales. The results obtained from the implementation of supportive strategies for the development of this “new” bioeconomy indicate, at least in the near future, mixed results in comparison to the objectives that have been set. This may be explained by windfall effects created on the international markets and underline two imperative needs. The development and improvement of environmental methods, such as life cycle assessment expanded to the scope of international trade and not restricted to the regional or national economies will be necessary in order to install ambitious and unambiguous agreements for policymaker’s in the future international conferences such as the ones on climate change.
- Research Article
42
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119810
- Dec 23, 2019
- Journal of Cleaner Production
Mycoremediation of phenols and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from a biorefinery wastewater and concomitant production of lignin modifying enzymes
- Research Article
68
- 10.1016/j.copbio.2015.12.021
- Jan 22, 2016
- Current Opinion in Biotechnology
Life cycle assessment of lignocellulosic ethanol: a review of key factors and methods affecting calculated GHG emissions and energy use
- Book Chapter
1
- 10.1002/9781119152057.ch14
- Apr 3, 2020
Life Cycle Assessment of Biofuels and Green Commodity Chemicals
- Preprint Article
- 10.21203/rs.3.rs-2986558/v1
- May 31, 2023
Abstract Background Bioenergy is a significant contributor to renewable power generation, renewable transport fuel and renewable heat. However, the deployed capacity significantly lags identified potential and has not seen the same rapid response to policy stimuli observed in the solar and wind sectors. This work analyses the historical trajectory of UK bioenergy development to discern potential underpinning reasons for that.Results It is noted that the technology landscape is arguably more complex than in other renewables, with multiple feedstocks, pre-treatment and conversion technologies involved in potentially hundreds of different pathways/combinations; not all of these pathways/combinations deliver greenhouse gas reductions, and most have other impacts (positive and negative) that go beyond energy and greenhouse gas balances to interact with atmospheric, aquatic, land, economic and social systems. We apply a risk management approach to show how disaggregation of the system can support more appropriate decision-making and provide greater resilience to the inherent variability associated with natural, land-based systems.Conclusions It is concluded that disaggregation of bioenergy systems into 3 sub-systems allows management of the most significant risks to be placed with the parties most able to deal with them and that a simple, semi-quantitative assessment of the performance of each sub-system facilitates an effective ranking of the “best” use of biomass in line with policy objectives; supporting effective decision making about priority feedstocks, technologies and demand sectors.
- Book Chapter
7
- 10.1016/b978-0-08-101036-5.00013-6
- Dec 1, 2017
- Greenhouse Gas Balances of Bioenergy Systems
Chapter 13 - Second-Generation Ethanol from Lignocellulose
- Research Article
80
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118237
- Sep 6, 2019
- Journal of Cleaner Production
Green and clean process to obtain low degree of polymerisation xylooligosaccharides from almond shell
- Research Article
23
- 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.115213
- Jun 27, 2022
- Industrial Crops and Products
A review on the production and recovery of sugars from lignocellulosics for use in the synthesis of bioproducts
- Research Article
12
- 10.1002/er.1742
- Jul 26, 2010
- International Journal of Energy Research
In this paper, a comprehensive study on corn-based ethanol in a Canadian context is conducted, which uses the most reliable and up to date data, considers realistic assumptions, and applies sound methodology to provide a basis for developing future scenarios for corn-based ethanol and compared the results with the conventional fuel, such as gasoline. It is estimated that the net energy value (NEV), defined as the energy content of a liter of ethanol minus the total energy use to produce a liter of ethanol, is 9.6 MJ L−1 (LHV), when co-products energy credits are not considered. In addition, a comparison of life cycle energy use for corn-based ethanol and gasoline reveals that the life cycle energy use to produce a liter of ethanol is considerably less than the life cycle energy use to produce a liter of gasoline. Furthermore, a comparison of life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions for corn-based ethanol and gasoline reveals that the life cycle GHG emissions released per liter of ethanol produced is an order of magnitude lesser than the life cycle GHG emissions released per liter of gasoline produced, when GHG emissions displaced by ethanol co-products are considered in the estimation. Finally, a comparison of our results in terms of net fossil fuel input, net fossil fuel ratio and GHG emissions is carried out with the results obtained from the ERG biofuel analysis meta-model (EBAMM) to reflect both Canadian and US perspectives. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
- Research Article
65
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.12.050
- Dec 20, 2014
- Journal of Cleaner Production
Life cycle energy and greenhouse gas assessment of the co-production of biosolids and biochar for land application
- Research Article
13
- 10.3390/pr10112299
- Nov 5, 2022
- Processes
Aluminum production is a major energy consumer and important source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions globally. Estimation of the energy consumption and GHG emissions caused by aluminum production in China has attracted widespread attention because China produces more than half of the global aluminum. This paper conducted life cycle (LC) energy consumption and GHG emissions analysis of primary and recycled aluminum in China for the year 2020, considering the provincial differences on both the scale of self-generated electricity consumed in primary aluminum production and the generation source of grid electricity. Potentials for energy saving and GHG emissions reductions were also investigated. The results indicate that there are 157,207 MJ of primary fossil energy (PE) consumption and 15,947 kg CO2-eq of GHG emissions per ton of primary aluminum ingot production in China, with the LC GHG emissions as high as 1.5–3.5 times that of developed economies. The LC PE consumption and GHG emissions of recycled aluminum are very low, only 7.5% and 5.3% that of primary aluminum, respectively. Provincial-level results indicate that the LC PE and GHG emissions intensities of primary aluminum in the main production areas are generally higher while those of recycled aluminum are lower in the main production areas. LC PE consumption and GHG emissions can be significantly reduced by decreasing electricity consumption, self-generated electricity management, low-carbon grid electricity development, and industrial relocation. Based on this study, policy suggestions for China’s aluminum industry are proposed. Recycled aluminum industry development, restriction of self-generated electricity, low-carbon electricity utilization, and industrial relocation should be promoted as they are highly helpful for reducing the LC PE consumption and GHG emissions of the aluminum industry. In addition, it is recommended that the central government considers the differences among provinces when designing and implementing policies.
- Research Article
58
- 10.1186/1754-6834-6-141
- Jan 1, 2013
- Biotechnology for Biofuels
BackgroundThe availability of feedstock options is a key to meeting the volumetric requirement of 136.3 billion liters of renewable fuels per year beginning in 2022, as required in the US 2007 Energy Independence and Security Act. Life-cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions of sorghum-based ethanol need to be assessed for sorghum to play a role in meeting that requirement.ResultsMultiple sorghum-based ethanol production pathways show diverse well-to-wheels (WTW) energy use and GHG emissions due to differences in energy use and fertilizer use intensity associated with sorghum growth and differences in the ethanol conversion processes. All sorghum-based ethanol pathways can achieve significant fossil energy savings. Relative to GHG emissions from conventional gasoline, grain sorghum-based ethanol can reduce WTW GHG emissions by 35% or 23%, respectively, when wet or dried distillers grains with solubles (DGS) is the co-product and fossil natural gas (FNG) is consumed as the process fuel. The reduction increased to 56% or 55%, respectively, for wet or dried DGS co-production when renewable natural gas (RNG) from anaerobic digestion of animal waste is used as the process fuel. These results do not include land-use change (LUC) GHG emissions, which we take as negligible. If LUC GHG emissions for grain sorghum ethanol as estimated by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) are included (26 g CO2e/MJ), these reductions when wet DGS is co-produced decrease to 7% or 29% when FNG or RNG is used as the process fuel. Sweet sorghum-based ethanol can reduce GHG emissions by 71% or 72% without or with use of co-produced vinasse as farm fertilizer, respectively, in ethanol plants using only sugar juice to produce ethanol. If both sugar and cellulosic bagasse were used in the future for ethanol production, an ethanol plant with a combined heat and power (CHP) system that supplies all process energy can achieve a GHG emission reduction of 70% or 72%, respectively, without or with vinasse fertigation. Forage sorghum-based ethanol can achieve a 49% WTW GHG emission reduction when ethanol plants meet process energy demands with CHP. In the case of forage sorghum and an integrated sweet sorghum pathway, the use of a portion of feedstock to fuel CHP systems significantly reduces fossil fuel consumption and GHG emissions.ConclusionsThis study provides new insight into life-cycle energy use and GHG emissions of multiple sorghum-based ethanol production pathways in the US. Our results show that adding sorghum feedstocks to the existing options for ethanol production could help in meeting the requirements for volumes of renewable, advanced and cellulosic bioethanol production in the US required by the EPA’s Renewable Fuel Standard program.
- Research Article
6
- 10.2175/106143012x13560205144371
- Jul 1, 2013
- Water Environment Research
This paper quantifies life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) in India versus water quality improvements achieved from infrastructure investments. A first such analysis is conducted using operating data for a WRRF, which employs upflow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) reactors and oxidation. On-site operations energy use, process GHG emissions, and embodied energy in infrastructure were quantified. The analysis showed energy use and GHG emissions of 0.2 watt-hours (Wh) and 0.3 gram carbon dioxide (CO2) equivalents per liter (gCO2e/L) wastewater treated, and 1.3 Wh and 2.1 gCO2e/gBOD removed, achieving 81% biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) and 999% fecal coliform removal annually. Process emissions of WRRFs contributed 44% of life cycle GHG emissions, similar in magnitude to those from electricity (46%), whereas infrastructure contributed 10%. Average WRRF-associated GHG emissions (0.9gCO2e/L) were lower than those expected if untreated wastewater was released to the river. Investments made by WRRFs in developing world cities improve water quality and may mitigate overall GHG emissions.
- Research Article
43
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.05.070
- May 17, 2016
- Applied Energy
A feasibility study of microgrids for reducing energy use and GHG emissions in an industrial application
- Research Article
32
- 10.1002/bbb.286
- May 1, 2011
- Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
The performance of lignocellulosic ethanol in reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and fossil energy use when substituting for gasoline depends on production technologies and system decisions, many of which have not been considered in life cycle studies. We investigate ethanol production from short rotation forestry feedstock via an uncatalyzed steam explosion pre‐treatment and enzymatic hydrolysis process developed by Mascoma Canada, Inc., and examine a set of production system decisions (co‐location, co‐production, and process energy options) in terms of their influence on life cycle emissions and energy consumption. All production options are found to reduce emissions and petroleum use relative to gasoline on a well‐to‐wheel (WTW) basis; GHG reductions vary by production scenario. Land‐use‐change effects are not included due to a lack of applicable data on short rotation forestry feedstock. Ethanol production with wood pellet co‐product, displacing coal in electricity generation, performs best amongst co‐products in terms of GHG mitigation (−109% relative to gasoline, WTW basis). Maximizing pellet output, although requiring import of predominately fossil‐based process energy, improves overall GHG‐mitigation performance (−130% relative to gasoline, WTW). Similarly, lower ethanol yields result in greater GHG reductions because of increased co‐product output. Co‐locating ethanol production with facilities exporting excess steam and biomass‐based electricity (e.g. pulp mills) achieves the greatest GHG mitigation (−174% relative to gasoline, WTW) by maximizing pellet output and utilizing low‐GHG process energy. By exploiting co‐location opportunities and strategically selecting co‐products, lignocellulosic ethanol can provide large emission reductions, particularly if based upon sustainably grown, high yield, low input feedstocks. © 2011 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Research Article
42
- 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110144
- Aug 7, 2020
- Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
Life-cycle energy use and greenhouse gas emissions of palm fatty acid distillate derived renewable diesel
- Research Article
37
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.114422
- Jan 6, 2020
- Applied Energy
A probabilistic fleet analysis for energy consumption, life cycle cost and greenhouse gas emissions modelling of bus technologies
- Research Article
202
- 10.1021/es3042115
- May 28, 2013
- Environmental Science & Technology
Replacing conventional materials (steel and iron) with lighter alternatives (e.g., aluminum, magnesium, and composites) decreases energy consumption and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions during vehicle use but may increase energy consumption and GHG emissions during vehicle production. There have been many life cycle assessment (LCA) studies on the benefits of vehicle lightweighting, but the wide variety of assumptions used makes it difficult to compare results from the studies. To clarify the benefits of vehicle lightweighting we have reviewed the available literature (43 studies). The GHG emissions and primary energy results from 33 studies that passed a screening process were harmonized using a common set of assumptions (lifetime distance traveled, fuel-mass coefficient, secondary weight reduction factor, fuel consumption allocation, recycling rate, and energy intensity of materials). After harmonization, all studies indicate that using aluminum, glass-fiber reinforced plastic, and high strength steel to replace conventional steel decreases the vehicle life cycle energy use and GHG emissions. Given the flexibility in options implied by the variety of materials available and consensus that these materials have substantial energy and emissions benefits, it seems likely that lightweighting will be used increasingly to improve fuel economy and reduce life cycle GHG emissions from vehicles.
- Research Article
2
- 10.4236/lce.2012.323014
- Jan 1, 2012
- Low Carbon Economy
Life-cycle analyses of energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions were carried out for three scenarios of the Coskata biomass-to-ethanol (EtOH) process under Chinese conditions using the original Tsinghua China Automotive Energy LCA Model in conjunction with a module developed particularly for the Coskata process. The results show that 1) the Coskata pathway has good performance in terms of life-cycle fossil energy use and GHG emissions; 2) the electricity used in the biomass-to-EtOH process has the most significant effect on life-cycle fossil-energy use, natural gas as boiler fuel has the second-greatest effect, while fuel used in feedstock transportation has the third; and 3) different energy resources for boilers in the biomass-to-EtOH factory provide different life-cycle results: coal is the least favorable while biomass is the most favorable. We conclude that 1) the Coskata pathway has the dual merits of fossil energy-savings and lower GHG emissions compared with all other bio-EtOH pathways and conventional gasoline in China; and 2) shifting from coal as the fuel for factory boilers to biomass will strengthen the advantages.
- Research Article
19
- 10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117886
- Sep 30, 2021
- Applied Energy
Life cycle embodied, operational and mobility-related energy and greenhouse gas emissions analysis of a green development in Melbourne, Australia
- Research Article
13
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.10.073
- Nov 6, 2015
- Journal of Cleaner Production
Introducing demand to supply ratio as a new metric for understanding life cycle greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from rainwater harvesting systems
- Research Article
220
- 10.1002/bbb.289
- May 23, 2011
- Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining
Sugarcane is currently the main renewable energy source in Brazil. Due to the importance of the cane industry and its contribution to a wide range of biobased energy and other products, LCA studies regarding cane‐derived products are needed to assess their environmental benefits. The main objective of this work was the assessment of life cycle energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions related to cane sugar and ethanol, considering bagasse and electricity surpluses as coproducts. We performed an overall balance for the Brazilian Center‐South Region, adopting different methods to evaluate sugar and ethanol production separately. The GREET 1.8c.0 model was used for the ‘well‐to‐wheels’ calculations but adapted to the comprehensive set of Brazilian parameters that best represent the Center‐South Region. For the reference case, fossil energy use and GHG emissions related to sugar production were evaluated as 721 kJ/kg and 234 g CO2eq/kg, respectively. For the ethanol life cycle, these values were 80 kJ/MJ and 21.3 g CO2eq/MJ. Special attention was paid to the variation of some parameters among producing units based on data collected by industry. The consequent uncertainties in ethanol life cycle emissions were assessed through a Monte Carlo analysis based on assigned distribution of probability curves for eleven selected parameters and informed by partial statistical data available from industry for distribution generation. Projections were also made for 2020 scenario parameters based on the best in current class technologies and technological improvements deemed commercially possible today. Published in 2011 by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
- Research Article
13
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.143717
- Sep 17, 2024
- Journal of Cleaner Production
Impacts of alternative fuel combustion in cement manufacturing: Life cycle greenhouse gas, biogenic carbon, and criteria air contaminant emissions
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146825
- Nov 1, 2025
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146818
- Nov 1, 2025
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146878
- Nov 1, 2025
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146833
- Nov 1, 2025
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146924
- Nov 1, 2025
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146950
- Nov 1, 2025
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146931
- Nov 1, 2025
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146846
- Nov 1, 2025
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146938
- Nov 1, 2025
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- New
- Research Article
- 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.146876
- Nov 1, 2025
- Journal of Cleaner Production
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.