Abstract
This paper assesses the impacts of Payment for Forest Environmental Services (PFES) in Cat Tien National Park, Vietnam. We analyze the impacts and additionality of PFES on local livelihoods by comparing the socio-economic situations in four pairs of villages before and after its implementation, and between places where PFES is and is not applied. In total, 149 people participated in focus group discussions, while 244 households (123 in areas with PFES and 121 in areas without) took part in household surveys. Our research shows that 92% of the people interviewed are from ethnic minorities participating and benefiting directly from PFES. In villages with PFES, the numbers of participating households ranged from 45% to 88% of all poor households in those villages. Of the poor households participating in PFES in the studied villages, 22% have no source of cash income other than their forest protection contracts, while 81.4% have escaped poverty, based on self-defined poverty criteria, through additional income from forest protection. Since the implementation of PFES, the area of forests allocated for community and household management is estimated to be three to 3.64 times higher than it had been previously. Although the number of communities under PFES contracts has not changed, the number of households participating in forest protection contracts is now much lower than before PFES started. On average, PFES contributes 16% to 74% of total household income in villages with PFES. Incomes in places with PFES are significantly higher than in places without. Although our research demonstrates immediate positive socio-economic impacts on livelihoods, it also highlights weaknesses in the current monitoring and evaluation system and a lack of reliable data for measuring PFES impacts in Cat Tien National Park.
Highlights
Payment for Environmental Services (PES) is being implemented throughout the world with the aim of providing financial incentives for forest owners to protect forests more effectively
Debates persist over the impacts of these incentives within the global conservation community where some fear that social capital will be heavily undermined [1], while others are concerned about conservation gains [2], or that the issue of weak human capital will be amplified in contexts such as Mozambique [3]
Carrying out an analysis to determine the impacts of Payment for Forest Environmental Services (PFES) on area of forest cover was beyond the scope of this study, all available data is consolidated in Figure 3, which shows the area of forest providing forest environmental services fluctuated from year to year but showed a general upward trend from 27,008 ha in 2010 to 78,477 ha in 2019
Summary
Payment for Environmental Services (PES) is being implemented throughout the world with the aim of providing financial incentives for forest owners to protect forests more effectively. Multiple countries have adopted national payment programs as part of their efforts to reduce global emissions from land cover change or to protect biodiversity (those operating for at least five years include programs in Mexico, Costa Rica, China, Ecuador, Peru, Brazil, Vietnam, and the United States). The Government of Vietnam has issued its own Payment for Forest Environmental. Its aim is to mobilize resources for the forestry sector to protect existing forest areas, improve forest quality, increase forestry sector contributions to the national economy, and reduce the forestry sector investment burden on the State budget [4,5]. PFES contributed 28.1% of total forestry sector investment in 2019 and 26.4% up to November 2020 [6] and is implemented in 45 provinces nationwide
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.