Abstract

To assess the beneficial effects of ischemic preconditioning (IPC) in liver resection and evaluate its applicability in clinical practice. Liver surgeries are usually associated with intentional transient ischemia for hemostatic control. IPC is a surgical step that intends to reduce the effects of ischemia/reperfusion; however, there is no strong evidence about the real impact of the IPC, and it is necessary to effectively clarify what its effects are. Randomized clinical trials were selected comparing IPC with no preconditioning in patients undergoing liver resection. Data were extracted by three independent researchers according to the PRISMA guidelines, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/JS9/A79. Several outcomes were evaluated, including postoperative peaks of transaminases and bilirubin, mortality, length of hospital stay, length of stay in the ICU, bleeding, transfusion of blood products, among others. Bias risks were assessed using the Cochrane collaboration tool. 17 articles were selected, with a total of 1,052 patients. IPC did not change the surgical time of the liver resections while these patients bled less (MD: -49.97mL, 95% CI, -86.32 to -13.6, I²: 64%), needed less blood products (RR: 0.71, 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.96; I²=0%), and had a lower risk of postoperative ascites (RR 0.40, 95% CI, 0.17 to 0.93; I²=0%). The other outcomes had no statistical differences or could not have their meta-analyses conducted due to high heterogeneity. IPC is applicable in clinical practice and it has some beneficial effect. However, there is not enough evidence to encourage its routine use.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call