Abstract
BackgroundEnhancing water provision services is a common target in forest restoration projects worldwide due to growing concerns over freshwater scarcity. However, whether or not forest cover expansion or restoration can improve water provision services is still unclear and highly disputed.PurposeThe goal of this review is to provide a balanced and impartial assessment of the impacts of forest restoration and forest cover expansion on water yields as informed by the scientific literature. Potential sources of bias on the results of papers published are also examined.Data sourcesEnglish, Spanish and Portuguese peer-review articles in Agricola, CAB s, ISI Web of Science, JSTOR, Google Scholar, and SciELO. Databases were searched through 2015.Search termsIntervention terms included forest restoration, regeneration/regrowth, forest second-growth, forestation/afforestation, and forestry. Target terms included water yield/quantity, streamflow, discharge, channel runoff, and annual flow.Study selection and eligibility criteriaArticles were pre-selected based on key words in the title, abstract or text. Eligible articles addressed relevant interventions and targets and included quantitative information.ResultsMost studies reported decreases in water yields following the intervention, while other hydrological benefits have been observed. However, relatively few studies focused specifically on forest restoration, especially with native species, and/or on projects done at large spatial or temporal scales. Information is especially limited for the humid tropics and subtropics.Conclusions and implications of key findingsWhile most studies reported a decrease in water yields, meta-analyses from a sub-set of studies suggest the potential influence of temporal and/or spatial scales on the outcomes of forest cover expansion or restoration projects. Given the many other benefits of forest restoration, improving our understanding of when and why forest restoration can lead to recovery of water yields is crucial to help improve positive outcomes and prevent unintended consequences. Our study identifies the critical types of studies and associated measurements needed.
Highlights
Water security is tightly linked to the availability of both surface water and groundwater stores directly accessed for human consumption and water that resides in the unsaturated soil layer and vegetation canopy [1]
While most studies reported a decrease in water yields, meta-analyses from a sub-set of studies suggest the potential influence of temporal and/or spatial scales on the outcomes of forest cover expansion or restoration projects
While this study reinforces the conclusions some other authors have reached, it has uncovered a tremendous bias in the portfolio of studies available to date–most
Summary
Water security is tightly linked to the availability of both surface water and groundwater stores directly accessed for human consumption (blue water) and water that resides in the unsaturated soil layer and vegetation canopy (green water) [1]. Because blue water contributes substantially to agricultural production and is critical for the support of wildlife and the provision of drinking water, there is great concern that growing demand has resulted in up to 2.9 billion people facing shortages of blue water for 3 to 6 months of a year [3]. For this reason, conservation efforts are focusing extensively on how to recover or retain existing water resources, including delivery to surface waters.
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
