Abstract

It is an accepted fact that many food products that we eat today have the possibility of being contaminated by various chemicals used from planting to processing. These chemicals have been shown to cause illnesses for which some concerned government agencies have instituted regulatory mechanisms to minimize the risks and the effects on humans. It is for these concerns that reliable and accurate rapid determination techniques are needed to effect proper regulatory standards for the protection of people's nutritional health. This paper, therefore, reports the comparative evaluation of the extraction methods in the determination of atrazine (commonly used in agricultural as a herbicide) residues in foods using supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC) and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) techniques. Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) and microwave solvent extraction (MSE) methods were used to test samples of frozen vegetables, fruit juice, and jam from local food markets in Houston. Results showed a high recovery percentage of atrazine residues using supercritical fluid coupled with ELISA and SFC than with MSE. Comparatively, however, atrazine was detected 90.9 and 54.5% using SFC and ELISA techniques, respectively. ELISA technique was, however, less time consuming, lower in cost, and more sensitive with low detection limit of atrazine residues than SFC technique.

Highlights

  • Atrazine is a selective pre- and early postemergence herbicide

  • Using Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE), microwave solvent extraction (MSE), supercritical fluid chromatography (SFC), and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), food samples from eleven different types of fruit juice, frozen vegetable, and strawberry jam samples were obtained from Houston local food markets

  • A comparison of the two extraction methods showed that both methods were effective, the ELISA was more effective than the SFE

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atrazine is a selective pre- and early postemergence herbicide It has been found in surface and ground water as a result of its mobility in soil. The way that many farmers are using atrazine in their cropping program creates avenues for food contamination and eventual health risks. This farming process is being reviewed and could lead to changes in the way these chemicals are used in the future. Atrazine residues are regularly being detected in numerous water bore and surface water catchments in country towns [1,2]. This means that atrazine has the potential to contaminate groundwater because of its slight water solubility, long half-life, and sorption to organic matter

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call