Abstract

Countries that are home to high levels of biodiversity need to address a fundamental question: which is more important, conservation of valuable – but unexplored – biodiversity, or deforestation for economic development? Brazil is one prominent and typical example of this struggle, finding itself at a crossroad because it is one of the major biodiversity centers in the world (∼20% of Earth’s biodiversity) with one of the largest centers of endemism (Government of Brazil, 2012a). Brazil is also a nation with record-breaking deforestation, having led to the removal of more than 165,000 km2 from the Amazon, the Cerrado, Mata Atlântica and other biomes within a period of five years, from 2000 to 2005 (Hansen et al., 2010). This is equivalent to double the total area of Austria. Brazilian deforestation was responsible for 30% of carbon emissions, between 2000 and 2010 mainly from replacement by cattle (71%) and soybean production (29%) in deforested areas (Karstensen et al., 2013). In situ conservation in Brazil is inefficient because government policies encourage the economic use of forests (Moran, 2011), similar to other countries such as

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.