Abstract

Determination of the microbial content in foods is important, not only for safe consumption, but also for food quality, value, and yield. A variety of molecular techniques are currently available for both identification and quantification of microbial content within samples; however, their success is often contingent upon proper sample preparation when the subject of investigation is a complex mixture of components such as foods. Because of the importance of sample preparation, the present study employs a systematic approach to compare the effects of four different separation techniques (glass wool, 50 μm polypropylene filters, graphite felt, and continuous flow centrifugation (CFC)) on sample preparation. To define the physical effects associated with the use of these separation methods, a multifactorial analysis was performed where particle size and composition, both pre- and post- processing, were analyzed for four different food matrices including lean ground beef, ground pork, ground turkey and spinach. Retention of three important foodborne bacterial pathogens (Escherichia coli O157:H7, Salmonella enterica, and Listeria monocytogenes) was also examined to evaluate the feasibility of the aforementioned methods to be utilized within the context of foodborne pathogen detection. Data from the multifactorial analysis not only delineated the particle size ranges but also defined the unique compositional profiles and quantified the bacterial retention. The three filtration membranes allowed for the passage of bacteria with minimal loss while CFC concentrated the inoculated bacteria. In addition, the deposition and therefore concentration of food matrix observed with CFC was considerably higher for meat samples relative to spinach. However, filtration with glass wool prior to CFC helped clarify meat samples, which led to considerably lower amounts of solids in the CFC vessel post processing and an increase in the recovery of the bacteria. Overall, by laying a framework for the deductive selection of sample preparation techniques, the results of the study can be applied to a range of applications where it would be beneficial to scientifically guide the pairing of the criteria associated with a downstream detection method with the most advantageous sample preparation techniques for complex matrices such as foods.

Highlights

  • The microbial content in foods is important for safe consumption, and affects the quality, value, and yield for some production processes, along with affecting the ability to avert negative economic impacts attributable to premature spoilage

  • The experiment was designed to keep the volume of food homogenate constant at ~1 L, while retaining the specified food dilution ratios, 1:4 and 1:10, as specified in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Microbiological Laboratory Guidebook (MLG) [28] and United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Bacteriological Analytical Manual

  • Because knowledge concerning the particle size distribution resulting from the use of a filter can be imperative for the development of applicable/appropriate sample preparation techniques, we determined the size distribution of particles post-treatment for several different separation processes commonly employed for sample clean-up

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The microbial content in foods is important for safe consumption, and affects the quality, value, and yield for some production processes (e.g., fermentation), along with affecting the ability to avert negative economic impacts attributable to premature spoilage. Contaminating bacteria may be responsible for foodborne illnesses, resulting in unwanted medical expenses and time off from work, chronic sequelae or even death [1,2]. Rapid methods that can both detect the presence of and identify pathogenic bacteria, which are sometimes only found at very low levels, are highly desirable [3,4,5]. Because these methods may be used for on-line or near-line microbiological screening, food production may proceed unimpeded. Use of these methods allow for the timely certification of any product held back from release due to testing

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.