Abstract
Abstract. Lakes are under increasing pressure due to widespread anthropogenic impacts related to rapid development and population growth. Accordingly, many lakes are currently undergoing a systematic decline in water quality. Recent studies have highlighted that global warming and the subsequent changes in water use may further exacerbate eutrophication in lakes. Lake evolution depends strongly on hydrologic balance, and therefore on groundwater connectivity. Groundwater also influences the sensitivity of lacustrine ecosystems to climate and environmental changes, and governs their resilience. Improved characterization of groundwater exchange with lakes is needed today for lake preservation, lake restoration, and sustainable management of lake water quality into the future. In this context, the aim of the present paper is to determine if the future evolution of the climate, the population, and the recharge could modify the geochemistry of lakes (mainly isotopic signature and quality via phosphorous load) and if the isotopic monitoring of lakes could be an efficient tool to highlight the variability of the water budget and quality. Small groundwater-connected lakes were chosen to simulate changes in water balance and water quality expected under future climate change scenarios, namely representative concentration pathways (RCPs) 4.5 and 8.5. Contemporary baseline conditions, including isotope mass balance and geochemical characteristics, were determined through an intensive field-based research program prior to the simulations. Results highlight that future lake geochemistry and isotopic composition trends will depend on four main parameters: location (and therefore climate conditions), lake catchment size (which impacts the intensity of the flux change), lake volume (which impacts the range of variation), and lake G index (i.e., the percentage of groundwater that makes up total lake inflows), the latter being the dominant control on water balance conditions, as revealed by the sensitivity of lake isotopic composition. Based on these model simulations, stable isotopes appear to be especially useful for detecting changes in recharge to lakes with a G index of between 50 and 80 %, but response is non-linear. Simulated monthly trends reveal that evolution of annual lake isotopic composition can be dampened by opposing monthly recharge fluctuations. It is also shown that changes in water quality in groundwater-connected lakes depend significantly on lake location and on the intensity of recharge change.
Highlights
Climate change, combined with rapidly expanding urban, industrial, and agricultural water needs, has placed increasing stress on water resources and on groundwater resources in particular
The two main objectives of this study are (i) to determine how future groundwater recharge changes might affect lake water balance and geochemistry and (ii) to assess whether stable isotopes might be an effective tool for identifying lakes that are susceptible to change or are undergoing changes in water balance and water quality
The main objectives of this study were to determine how future trends in groundwater recharge can affect lake geochemistry, and to assess whether stable isotopes might be an effective tool for identifying lakes that are susceptible to change, or are undergoing changes, in their water budget and quality
Summary
Climate change, combined with rapidly expanding urban, industrial, and agricultural water needs, has placed increasing stress on water resources and on groundwater resources in particular. Many methods can be used to estimate groundwater recharge, such as water budget methods, modeling methods, tracer methods, and methods based on surface water interaction studies. The latter is based on the estimation of groundwater discharge to surface water, mainly by streambed seepage determination, streamflow duration curves, or streamflow hydrograph separation (Scanlon et al, 2002). The recharge amount (in mm yr−1) is typically obtained by dividing measured or estimated discharge flow by the surface drainage area at the measurement site This procedure assumes that aquifer boundaries coincide with watershed boundaries, and that the area of the aquifer that contributes to groundwater discharge is equal to the surface drainage area (Kuniansky, 1989; Rutledge, 1998, 2007). Miscalculation of the aquifer contributing area leads to a proportional error in recharge estimate
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
