Abstract

Social well-being and social justice are meant to create a positive outcome meaningful for people and societies. According to the guidelines of social life cycle assessment, especially well-being should be considered as the main area of protection to assess social impacts of products. In addition, equity and equality need to be addressed in terms of social justice to ensure a fair and ethic society. However, even if a lot of studies focused on the definition social indicators to assess resulting impacts, neither have scientific or common agreements been founded to define a valid set of indicators, nor have consistent pathways from inventory towards impact indicators been established. This work, therefore, proposes possible pathways from life cycle inventory to impact assessment of two social midpoint categories: fair wage and level of education. Respective cause-effect-chains are developed based on the environmental life cycle assessment principle. Correspondingly, social inventory indicators throughout direct impacts to midpoint and endpoint categories are defined. Three endpoint categories are included (economic welfare, damage to human health and environmental stability) to address social well-being and social justice. Qualitative characterization factors and a scaling method are proposed to evaluate the impacts according to threshold and reference values from valuable literature.

Highlights

  • Global recognition of sustainability started to appear in the early 1970s with the release of the book “Limit to Growth” to raise awareness on “(...) how to bring about a society that is materially sufficient, socially equitable and ecologically sustainable, and one that is more satisfying in human terms than the growth-obsessed society of today” [1]

  • It was shown that both considered midpoint categories fair wage and level of education are highly relevant for prosperity and well-being

  • The ultimate aim is to reach a level of fair wages for all workers and a level of higher education to gather economic welfare, an increase in environmental stability and a decrease in damage to human health

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Global recognition of sustainability started to appear in the early 1970s with the release of the book “Limit to Growth” to raise awareness on “(...) how to bring about a society that is materially sufficient, socially equitable and ecologically sustainable, and one that is more satisfying in human terms than the growth-obsessed society of today” [1]. 1987 [2], defined that sustainable development has to meet the needs of the present generation without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. 1992 [3], identified the four principles: equity, futurity, environment, and public participation to underline that sustainable development goes beyond pure environmental aspects. In this connection, the life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) method was established, consisting of a contemporary implementation of life cycle assessment (LCA), life cycle costing (LCC). Social life cycle assessment (SLCA) [4]. The assessment of the environmental dimension is the most advanced method within the LCSA framework, as LCA is a standardized method [5].

Objectives
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call