Abstract

The following exploration examined the impact of working conditions on faculty teaching for full-time faculty and non-tenure track faculty within an academic department at a large Midwestern university to determine whether employment status and working conditions potentially impacted student learning outcomes. Questions asked of participating faculty focused on factors related to, or influencing, teaching that may improve or hinder student learning. Factors such as available resources, interaction with department administrators and other faculty, job satisfaction, work-life integration, and mentorship were explored through written surveys and one-on-one interviews. Twelve faculty, out of a target population of 33, provided insight as to concerns or issues they felt impeded or supported teaching efforts. Although the exploration contained a small sample size, department administrators implemented changes to address faculty concerns to reduce “disconnects” and issues mentioned by faculty members. Primary changes occurred around part time faculty input on curriculum development and interactions with department administrators and full time faculty. While still ongoing, initial feedback is positive and indicates faculty are adapting to the changes. Further work is necessary to examine individual feelings of worth and value, as well as exploring actual student learning outcomes across courses.

Highlights

  • The purpose of this exploration was to examine the impact of working conditions on faculty teaching for full time faculty and non-tenure track faculty (NTTF)

  • The hypothesis was that a “disconnect” existed between part time faculty and full-time faculty (FTF) within the department that resulted in varying curriculum focus, an array of student learning outcomes, and lack scaffolding

  • Preliminary discussions indicated NTTF work in a silo, developing course material based on previous syllabi and modifying the course to fit individual expertise, without taking into consideration student learning objectives developed for the program

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The purpose of this exploration was to examine the impact of working conditions on faculty teaching for full time faculty and non-tenure track faculty (NTTF). The hypothesis was that a “disconnect” existed between part time faculty and full-time faculty (FTF) within the department that resulted in varying curriculum focus, an array of student learning outcomes, and lack scaffolding. Preliminary discussions indicated NTTF work in a silo, developing course material based on previous syllabi and modifying the course to fit individual expertise, without taking into consideration student learning objectives developed for the program. This has resulted in “curriculum creep” in which the original intent of the course is no longer recognized in the learning objectives, as well as full time faculty teaching entirely different material for the same course

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.