Impact of Wood Structure Variability on the Surface Roughness of Chestnut Wood

Abstract

Wood constitutes a unique and valuable material that has been used from ancient times until nowadays in a wide variety of applications, in which the surface quality of wood often constitutes a critical factor. In this study, the influence of different wood areas and therefore, of different anatomical characteristic areas of chestnut wood (Castanea sativa Mill.) on the surface quality, was thoroughly studied, in terms of surface roughness. Five different chestnut tree trunks were harvested, from which five different disks were obtained corresponding to five different trunk heights. Surface roughness was measured on these disks on the transverse, radial, and tangential planes, on the areas of sapwood and heartwood, measuring the roughness in each point both vertically and in parallel to the wood grain. The results revealed that the examined roughness indexes (Ra, Rz, Rq) follow a parallel path to one another. In the case of all surfaces (transverse, radial, tangential) of the disks examined, when the measurement was implemented perpendicularly to the wood grain, a significantly higher roughness was recorded, compared to the wood grain measurements being implemented in parallel with the wood grain. Significant differences between heartwood and sapwood roughness were not demonstrated, although sapwood often appeared to exhibit a higher surface roughness than heartwood sites. Among the roughness values of the three different surfaces, the highest roughness in the vertical-to-wood-grain measurements was recorded by tangential surfaces, with slightly lower values on the transverse surfaces and the lowest roughness on radial surfaces. Meanwhile, for the measurements in parallel with the wood grain, the transverse surfaces presented significantly higher roughness values compared to the tangential and radial surfaces. Significant roughness differences were not detected among the surfaces at different trunk heights. Although, significant differences in roughness were recorded among different trees, it was observed that all the studied trees align with the identified and described within-tree trends.