Impact of visual rotations on heading direction and center of mass control during steady-state gait.

Abstract

Visual information is essential to navigate the environment and maintain postural stability during gait. Visual field rotations alter the perceived heading direction, resulting in gait trajectory deviations, known as visual coupling. It is unclear how center of mass (CoM) control relative to a continuously changing base of support (BoS) is adapted to facilitate visual coupling. This study aimed to characterize mediolateral (ML) balance control during visual coupling in steady-state gait. Sixteen healthy participants walked on an instrumented treadmill, naive to sinusoidal low-frequency (0.1 Hz) rotations of the virtual environment around the vertical axis. Rotations were continuous with 1) high or 2) low amplitude or were 3) periodic with 10-s intervals. Visual coupling was characterized with cross-correlations between CoM trajectory and visual rotations. Balance control was characterized with the ML margin of stability (MoSML) and by quantifying foot placement control as the relation between CoM dynamics and lateral foot placement. Visual coupling was strong on a group level (continuous low: 0.88, continuous high: 0.91, periodic: 0.95) and moderate to strong on an individual level. Higher rotation amplitudes induced stronger gait trajectory deviations. The MoSML decreased toward the deviation direction and increased at the opposite side. Foot placement control was similar compared with regular gait. Furthermore, pelvis and foot reorientation toward the rotation direction was observed. We concluded that visual coupling was facilitated by reorientating the body and shifting the extrapolated CoMML closer to the lateral BoS boundary toward the adjusted heading direction while preserving CoM excursion and foot placement control.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Healthy, naive participants were unaware of subtle, low-frequency rotations of the visual field but still coupled their gait trajectory to a rotating virtual environment. In response, participants decreased their margin of stability toward the new heading direction, without changing the center of mass excursion magnitude and foot placement strategy.