Abstract

Our institution introduced universal vasa previa (VP) screening utilizing transabdominal ultrasound with color Doppler for all pregnancies at the second trimester anatomy scan. Our study sought to describe the clinical impact of this intervention. Radiology records from the 12 months pre- and post-intervention were queried for "vasa previa." Records included for analysis were those with a first-time diagnosis or discussion of VP at the anatomy scan. Cases were categorized by outcome: (Group 1) True VP, with subgroups A, unresolved by time of delivery and B, resolved by delivery; (Group 2) False positives; (Group 3) Possible VP without definitive diagnosis; and (Group 4) VP ruled out, for example, "no features of VP." Group size was expressed as a percentage of total anatomy scans during pre- or post-intervention periods respectively. Absolute and relative percent change were calculated for each group. In the pre-intervention period, 1 case (0.36% of total scans) was categorized in Group 1A, 1 case (0.36%) in Group 3, and 7 cases (2.53%) in Group 4. In the post-intervention period, 2 cases (0.30%) were in Group 1A, 4 cases (0.61%) in Group 1B, 2 cases (0.30%) in Group 2, 1 case (0.15%) in Group 3, and 7 cases (1.06%) in Group 4. There was a +153% relative change in true positives, from 0.36 to 0.91%. Universal color Doppler screening may have increased detection (sensitivity) while simultaneously increasing false positives (decreased specificity). While decreasing sensitivity is not ideal, this is acceptable given the potential catastrophic outcome of a missed VP.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call