Impact of two methods for assigning groups in a team-based learning self-care course

Abstract

IntroductionStudies have examined the impact of team formation strategies to performance on team assessments and perceptions of team dynamics. This study assessed the impact of intentional vs. randomized team formation strategies on a semester-long self-care pharmacotherapy course taught using team-based learning. MethodsStudents were intentionally assigned to teams in fall 2018 and randomized to teams in fall 2019. Performance on team readiness assessment tests (TRATs) was compared. Student perceptions regarding team dynamics were evaluated using a questionnaire. ResultsThe were no significant differences in TRAT scores between the intentional (n = 91; average 99.8%) and randomized (n = 68; average 99.9%) cohorts (P = .33). Response rates for the student perception questionnaires for the intentional and randomized cohorts were 85.7% and 77.9%, respectively. No significant differences existed between cohorts for any questionnaire items. ConclusionsThe type and number of criteria used to intentionally develop teams has varied across the literature and has generally failed to show significant differences in performance on team assessments regardless of team formation strategy. There have been varied findings with respect to the impact of team formation criteria on student perceptions related to team dynamics. In this study, intentionally assigning teams in a single semester-long course primarily using community pharmacy experience and significant relationships did not produce significant differences in team performance or student perceptions compared to randomization. For teams in a single semester course, randomization may be an efficient way of assigning students to teams without negatively impacting team performance or perceptions of team dynamics.