Impact of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) of mitral valve on the clinical outcomes in the management of atrial functional mitral regurgitation

Abstract

Abstract Background Atrial functional mitral regurgitation (aFMR) has become a novel topic of interest. Data on the safety and efficacy of transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) of mitral valve among patients with aFMR and ventricular functional mitral regurgitation (vFMR) is scarce and limited to single center studies. Purpose We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and efficacy of TEER in the management of aFMR vs vFMR and its impact on clinical outcomes. Methods PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Library and EMBASE databases were queried to identify studies comparing the efficacy of TEER between aFMR and vFMR. The primary outcome of interest was mortality at 1 year and composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) hospitalizations. Secondary outcomes included mitral regurgitation (MR) reduction, presence of residual MR, improvement in NYHA functional class, postoperatively and at 1-year. Risk ratios (RR’s) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using random-effects model. Results We included a total of 3,314 patients from 6 observational studies which met the inclusion criteria (mean age 63.8 ± 3.8 years, 43% male). There were 443 aFMR patients and 2871 vFMR patients with an average follow-up of 12 months. Mortality at 1-year and the composite outcome of all-cause mortality and heart failure hospitalizations were comparable between aFMR and vFMR groups (RR 1.06; 95% CI 0.64 - 1.75; p = 0.81 and RR 0.92; 95% CI 0.75 - 1.14; p = 0.47, respectively). There were no significant differences between aFMR and vFMR groups in terms of MR reduction postoperatively (RR 0.99; 95% CI 0.96 - 1.02; p = 0.53) or at 1-year (RR 1.15; 95% CI 0.96 - 1.38; p = 0.14). Moreover, the presence of residual MR grade ≥ 3+ postoperatively (RR 1.31; 95% CI 0.83 - 2.08; p = 0.25) and at 1-year (RR 0.96; 95% CI 0.44 - 2.11; p = 0.92) was similar between aFMR and vFMR cohorts. Overall, although there was a clinical improvement in symptoms in terms of NYHA functional class at 1 year (grade ≤ 2), there was no statistical significance between the two groups (RR 1.02; 95% CI 0.93 - 1.11; p = 0.74). Conclusion This meta-analysis suggests that transcatheter edge-to-edge repair is likely to be an efficacious and safe option in patients with aFMR and vFMR. Future randomized control trials are needed to fully assess the clinical impact of this procedure in the two MR etiologies.Figure 1Figure 2