Abstract
Previous alliancing research has seldom addressed the implication of transaction costs and the impact of transaction attributes on transaction costs in project alliancing. Using multiple regression analysis on a sample of Australian alliances, this study tests the differential impact of uncertainty, frequency, and various dimensions of contracting parties' asset specificity on three individual transaction cost elements (set-up, monitoring, and enforcement costs). The results indicate that the impact of transaction attributes on transaction costs varies. Uncertainty has a positive impact on all three transaction cost elements. Frequency and some dimensions of contracting parties' asset specificity are positively associated with set-up costs and monitoring costs, which, however, does not apply to enforcement costs. The findings provide empirical evidence in support of the transaction cost economics' prediction regarding the influence of transaction attributes on transaction costs in the Australian construction industry, and thereby add another perspective to the knowledge base in the construction management discipline. The measurement methods of transaction attributes and transaction costs presented have valuable implications for future research.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.