IMPACT OF TIME-TO-TEST FOR CLOSTRIDIOIDES DIFFICILE INFECTION ON LENGTH OF STAY IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE PATIENTS HOSPITALIZED WITH FLARE

Abstract

Abstract Background Guidelines recommend testing inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients hospitalized with flare for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), though little is known about whether a delay in testing for CDI is related to adverse outcomes. We examined the relationship between time-to-C. difficile PCR test order, collection, and result with adverse IBD outcomes. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of IBD patients hospitalized with flare through the emergency department (ED) between 2013 and 2020 at an urban academic medical center. The time from ED presentation to C. difficile test order (time-to-order), sample collection (time-to-collection), and test result (time-to-result) were collected. Time-to-result was stratified by within 6 hours, 6–24 hours, and 24 hours or longer. The primary outcome was length of stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes were inpatient anti-TNF administration and surgery. We used hemodynamic and laboratory values at presentation to evaluate disease severity as a confounding variable between length of stay and time-dependent variables. Results We identified 122 IBD patients hospitalized with flare. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics among time-to-result groups. Despite a shorter time-to-result, the average LOS in the 6 hours group was 7.3 days, longer compared to the 6–24 hours group (4.3 days, p=0.018) and the 24 hours group (4.2 days, p=0.035; Table 1). There were no differences in inpatient anti-TNF administration (p=0.10) or surgery (p=0.08) among time-to-result groups. The markers of disease severity that correlated with longer LOS were C-reactive protein (CRP) (0.28 days, p=0.003), heart rate (0.478 days, p<0.001), diastolic hypotension (0.228 days, p=0.01), and hypoalbuminemia (0.215 days, p=0.02). Higher CRP correlated with earlier time-to-result (-0.218 hours, p=0.02). Patients with more markers of disease severity had earlier times-to-result (12.8 hours vs. 32.2 hours, p=0.014) and had a longer LOS (7.9 vs. 3.4 days, p=0.007) (Table 2). Patients with more severe disease had an earlier time-to-order (4.48 hours) compared to those with less severe disease (17.4 hours), though this difference did not meet statistical significance (p=0.09; Table 2). Conclusion Earlier time-to-result for CDI is associated with longer LOS in IBD patients hospitalized with flare. This inverse relationship is confounded by disease severity at presentation: patients with more severe disease have a shorter time-to-result and a longer LOS. It may be that these patients produce a stool sample more readily; however, the near significance of differences in time-to-order among severity groups suggest a role for provider bias, which must be studied further. Delay in testing was not associated with higher rates of inpatient anti-TNF administration or surgery.