Abstract

Abstract. The Svalbard Archipelago consists of three basement terranes that record a complex Neoproterozoic–Phanerozoic tectonic history, including four contractional events (Grenvillian, Caledonian, Ellesmerian, and Eurekan) and two episodes of collapse- to rift-related extension (Devonian–Carboniferous and late Cenozoic). Previous studies suggest that these three terranes likely accreted during the early to mid-Paleozoic Caledonian and Ellesmerian orogenies. Yet recent geochronological analyses show that the northwestern and southwestern terranes of Svalbard both record an episode of amphibolite (–eclogite) facies metamorphism in the latest Neoproterozoic, which may relate to the 650–550 Ma Timanian Orogeny identified in northwestern Russia, northern Norway, and the Russian Barents Sea. However, discrete Timanian structures have yet to be identified in Svalbard and the Norwegian Barents Sea. Through analysis of seismic reflection, as well as regional gravimetric and magnetic data, this study demonstrates the presence of continuous thrust systems that are several kilometers thick, NNE-dipping, deeply buried, and extend thousands of kilometers from northwestern Russia to northeastern Norway, the northern Norwegian Barents Sea, and the Svalbard Archipelago. The consistency in orientation and geometry, as well as apparent linkage between these thrust systems and those recognized as part of the Timanian Orogeny in northwestern Russia and Novaya Zemlya, suggests that the mapped structures are likely Timanian. If correct, these findings would imply that Svalbard's three basement terranes and the Barents Sea were accreted onto northern Norway during the Timanian Orogeny and should hence be attached to Baltica and northwestern Russia in future Neoproterozoic–early Paleozoic plate tectonics reconstructions. In the Phanerozoic, the study suggests that the interpreted Timanian thrust systems represent major preexisting zones of weakness that were reactivated, folded, and overprinted by (i.e., controlled the formation of new) brittle faults during later tectonic events. These faults are still active at present and can be linked to folding and offset of the seafloor.

Highlights

  • Recognizing and linking tectonic events across different terranes are critical to plate reconstructions

  • In the latest Neoproterozoic, portions of northwestern Russia (e.g., Timan Range and Novaya Zemlya) and the Russian Barents Sea were accreted to northern Baltica by topSSW thrusting during the Timanian Orogeny (Olovyanishnikov et al, 2000; Kostyuchenko et al, 2006)

  • Timanian structures have only been identified in onshore–nearshore areas of northwestern Russia and northeastern Norway as well as offshore in the Russian Barents Sea and southeasternmost Norwegian Barents Sea (Barrère et al, 2009, 2011; Marello et al, 2010; Gernigon et al, 2018; Hassaan et al, 2020a, b, 2021; Hassaan, 2021)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recognizing and linking tectonic events across different terranes are critical to plate reconstructions. Some studies suggest a NE–SW-trending Caledonian suture within the Barents Sea (Gudlaugsson et al, 1998; Gee and Teben’kov, 2004; Breivik et al, 2005; Gee et al, 2008; Knudsen et al, 2019), whereas others argue for a swing into a N–S trend and merging of Norway and Svalbard’s Caledonides, which probably continue into northern Greenland (Ziegler, 1988; Gernigon and Brönner, 2012; Gernigon et al, 2014) Regardless, these models solely relate basement structures in the northern and southwestern Norwegian Barents Sea to the Caledonian Orogeny, implying that Laurentia and Svalbard were not involved in the Timanian Orogeny and were separated from Baltica by the Iapetus Ocean in the latest Neoproterozoic (Torsvik and Trench, 1991; Cawood et al, 2001; Cocks and Torsvik, 2005; Torsvik et al, 2010; Merdith et al, 2021)

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call