Abstract

IntroductionSince 2012, England has an annual “Stoptober” campaign for collective smoking cessation. Our aim was to assess (1) overall impact of the Stoptober campaign on quit attempts over its first 6 years, (2) consistency of impact over the campaign years, and (3) the role of the campaign budget.MethodsWe used data of 51 399 adult smokers and ex-smokers in 132 repeat cross-sectional monthly surveys in England, 2007–2017. In a quasiexperimental design, adjusted logistic regression analyses compared past-month quit attempt rate between (1) October and other months in the year, between 2007–2011 and 2012–2017; (2) October and other months, across years 2012–2017; and (3) October and other months, between high-budget (2012–2015) and low-budget Stoptober campaigns (2016–2017). Bayes factors (BF) differentiated insensitive data and absence of an effect.Results(1) In 2012–2017, quit attempts were more prevalent in October versus other months (odds ratio [OR]: 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.00 to 1.53), whereas similar in 2007–2011 (OR: 0.95, 95% CI: 0.76 to 1.18; BF = 0.2); data were somewhat insensitive but supported this difference (OR: 1.30, 95% CI: 0.97 to 1.75; BF = 2.1). (2) In 2012–2017, quit attempt prevalence ranged from 3.1% to 8.5% in October and 5.0% to 7.3% in other months. The difference between October and other months was large in 2012 (absolute unadjusted difference of 3.3%; OR: 1.92, 95% CI: 1.23 to 2.98) and 2015 (3.1%; OR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.14 to 2.95), but small in 2013–2014 and 2016–2017 (0.36 < BF < 1.02). (3) Data were somewhat insensitive but supported interaction with campaign budget (OR: 1.50, 95% CI: 0.92 to 2.44; BF = 2.2).DiscussionIn 2012–2017, there appears to have been an increase in past-month quit attempts during October in England. The increase was inconsistent across Stoptober campaigns and appears to have been greater when the campaign budget was higher.ImplicationsOver the first 6 years of Stoptober campaigns, there appears to have been an overall increase in past-month quit attempts during October in England, and the data imply that a sufficiently high budget contributes to greater impact of the Stoptober campaign. These findings encourage the further spread of the Stoptober campaign to other countries. Future research should clarify how increased quit attempts as a consequence of Stoptober translate into quit success and which of Stoptober’s ingredients were most important in increasing quit attempts, especially among vulnerable groups.

Highlights

  • Since 2012, England has an annual ‘Stoptober’ campaign for collective smoking cessation

  • The p impact of such a decline in expenditure may reduce campaign effectiveness, given that higher tobacco control mass media campaign expenditures have been associated with higher quit success e rates7. c This paper aimed to assess the overall impact of the Stoptober campaign over its first six years in c England

  • Age and gender were similar between October and other months, and between the Stoptober period p and pre-Stoptober period, but the proportion of individuals from lower social grades was higher in earlier years

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since 2012, England has an annual ‘Stoptober’ campaign for collective smoking cessation. T Results: 1) In 2012-2017, quit attempts were more prevalent in October vs other months (OR:1.24, ip 95%CI:1.00-1.53), while similar in 2007-2011 (OR:0·95, 95%CI:0·76-1·18; BF=0·2); data were somewhat insensitive, but supported this difference (OR:1·30, 95%CI:0·97-1·75; BF=2·1). R 2017, quit attempt prevalence ranged from 3.1-8.5% in October and 5.0-7.3% in other months. 3) Data were somewhat insensitive but supported interaction with campaign budget (OR:1·50, 95%CI:0·92-2·44; BF=2·2). Ipt Stoptober was designed to create a national collective effort to abstain for 28 days in October as a stepping stone to permanent cessation.

Objectives
Methods
Results
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.