Abstract

The scientific literature focusing on the numerical simulation of fuel sprays is rich in atomization and secondary break-up models. However, it is well known that the predictive capability of even the most diffused models is affected by the combination of injection parameters and operating conditions, especially backpressure. In this paper, an alternative atomization strategy is proposed for the 3D-Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulation of Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) sprays, aiming at extending simulation predictive capabilities over a wider range of operating conditions. In particular, attention is focused on the effects of back pressure, which has a remarkable impact on both the morphology and the sizing of GDI sprays. 3D-CFD Lagrangian simulations of two different multi-hole injectors are presented. The first injector is a 5-hole GDI prototype unit operated at ambient conditions. The second one is the well-known Spray G, characterized by a higher back pressure (up to 0.6 MPa). Numerical results are compared against experiments in terms of liquid penetration and Phase Doppler Anemometry (PDA) data of droplet sizing/velocity and imaging. CFD results are demonstrated to be highly sensitive to spray vessel pressure, mainly because of the atomization strategy. The proposed alternative approach proves to strongly reduce such dependency. Moreover, in order to further validate the alternative primary break-up strategy adopted for the initialization of the droplets, an internal nozzle flow simulation is carried out on the Spray G injector, able to provide information on the characteristic diameter of the liquid column exiting from the nozzle.

Highlights

  • Spray modeling capabilities represent a crucial aspect in 3D-Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations of internal combustion engines

  • Attention is focused on the effects of back pressure, which has a remarkable impact on both the morphology and the sizing of Gasoline Direct Injection (GDI) sprays. 3D-CFD Lagrangian simulations of two different multi-hole injectors are presented

  • In order to further validate the alternative primary break-up strategy adopted for the initialization of the droplets, an internal nozzle flow simulation is carried out on the Spray G injector, able to provide information on the characteristic diameter of the liquid column exiting from the nozzle

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spray modeling capabilities represent a crucial aspect in 3D-Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations of internal combustion engines. This is able to provide information on droplet initial conditions (to be applied to Lagrangian simulations) and, on droplet diameters These last are found to be slightly greater than 130 μm, similar to nozzle hole dimension and one order of magnitude larger than values provided by PDA measurements at 15 mm from the injector tip.

G Injector
Phase points for for the the Spray
Figure
Droplet and velocityat are investigated at
Injection
A Reynolds-averaged
10. Comparison
12. Comparison
14. Comparison
Spray G Injector Lagrangian Simulation Results
16. Comparison
17. Comparison
18. Pressure
19. Comparison
20. Comparison
23. Comparison
Inner-Nozzle Flow Simulation Setup
24. Computational
25. Boundary
26. Output
Results
31. Numerical-experimental
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call