Abstract

RuII(cym)Cl (cym = η6-p-cymene) complexes of pyridinecarbothioamides have shown potential for development as orally active anticancer metallodrugs, underlined by their high selectivity towards plectin as the molecular target. In order to investigate the impact of the metal center on the anticancer activity and their physicochemical properties, the Os(cym), Rh- and Ir(Cp*) (Cp* = pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) analogues of the most promising and orally active compound plecstatin 2 were prepared and characterized by spectroscopic techniques and X-ray diffraction analysis. Dissolution in aqueous medium results in quick ligand exchange reactions; however, over time no further changes in the 1H NMR spectra were observed. The Rh- and Ir(Cp*) complexes were investigated for their reactions with amino acids, and while they reacted with Cys, no reaction with His was observed. Studies on the in vitro anticancer activity identified the Ru derivatives as the most potent, independent of their halido leaving group, while the Rh derivative was more active than the Ir analogue. This demonstrates that the metal center has a significant impact on the anticancer activity of the compound class.

Highlights

  • In antineoplastic drug development, metal complexes have attracted attention due to their unique properties such as structural 3D arrangement, interesting photophysical properties and their ability to form specific interactions with biomolecules [1,2,3]

  • It was converted into metal complexes 2–8 by reaction with the dimeric precursors [M(π-bound ligand)X2]2 (M = RuII, OsII, RhIII, IrIII; π-bound Molecules 2021, 26, x FOR PEER REVlIiEgWand = cym, Cp*; X = Cl, Br, I; Scheme 1) for 4 h at 40 ◦C [35], while 2 and 5 were repo3rtoefd12 earlier [34]

  • The coordination of PCA ligands to metal ions has resulted in compounds with promising in vitro and in vivo anticancer activity [34,35,36]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Metal complexes have attracted attention due to their unique properties such as structural 3D arrangement, interesting photophysical properties and their ability to form specific interactions with biomolecules [1,2,3]. The discovery of Ru-based RAPTA-C [Ru(cym)(pta)Cl2] [cym = η6-p-cymene, pta = 1,3,5-triaza-7-phoshatricyclo[3.3.1.1]decane) and RAED-C [Ru(cym)(en)Cl]PF6 (en = ethylene-1,2-diamine) with contrasting biological activity and different modes of action has fueled research into half-sandwich RuII(η6-arene) complexes [12,13,14,15,16]. The antiproliferative activity of Ru(arene) complexes is often dictated by the coordinating ligands or their substituents [17], such as ethacrynic acid [18], chlorambucil [19], quinolines [20,21,22], quinolones [23], lapachol [24], flavonols [25,26], and oxicam [27,28,29] derivatives

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call