Abstract

A computer model was developed to simulate the varying depths of water applied to the ground due to the intermittent movements of a typical center pivot. The stop–go model inputs include the sprinkler application depth, the sprinkler pattern, that pattern’s wetted radius, the center pivot’s % timer setting, the move cycle time, and the end tower maximum travel speed. The model outputs were the depth of application in the pivot’s movement direction, the distribution uniformity (DU), and the coefficient of uniformity (CU). The results revealed that the pivot circular application uniformity is mostly a function of the move distance as a percent of the sprinklers’ wetted radius. This, in turn, is a function of the percent timer setting, the cycle time, and the end tower travel speed. Due to this, the high-speed center pivots had corresponding lower application uniformities compared to low-speed machines, and sprinklers with larger wetted radii resulted in better uniformity. Shortening the cycle time also resulted in higher uniformity coefficients. Based on these results, it is recommended that the run time be set based on the pivot end-tower’s travel speed and sprinkler wetted radius, such that the end tower move distance is equivalent to the sprinkler wetted radius. This will reduce wear to the tower motors due to the on–off cycling, especially for slow travel settings and for sprinklers with larger wetted radii. The ponding depths at different percent of the move distance, for the potential runoff, were estimated, which were set to be equivalent to the wetted radius.

Highlights

  • More than half of the irrigated acreage in the United States (US) is irrigated by center pivots

  • We simulated the effect of different cycle times, travel speed, % setting, and wetted radius as separate on the irrigation uniformity; we investigated their relationship on irrigation uniformity

  • Using the small, wetted radii allows investigating if there is a significant difference in machine travel speed and the timer setting on the distribution uniformity (DU) and coefficient of uniformity (CU)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

More than half of the irrigated acreage in the United States (US) is irrigated by center pivots. Small improvements to the performances of these machines can have a great impact on the overall water conservation in the US [1]. In order to adequately irrigate a field, additional water needs to be applied everywhere in order to adequately irrigate the areas of the field that are getting small amounts of water. Uniformity can be achieved by modeling sprinklers pattern along center pivot’s pipeline or along the machine path. Modeling the application pattern of sprinklers on center pivot may help in the design of the machine’s nozzle chart to reach a high uniformity [2,3,4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call