Abstract
This paper introduces a two-step strategy, the synthetic control method combined with the difference-in-differences method, to evaluate the effectiveness of the Dodd-Frank Act (DFA). We find no evidence from our counterfactual analysis in support of the DFA reducing systemic risk in the US banking system. Our results suggest that endogenous risk persistence is the main driver for the decrease in systemic risk in the post-DFA period. Additional analyses regarding the predictive power of the synthetic control method, endogeneity concerns and anticipation effects support the robustness of our findings.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
