Abstract

This study investigated the impact of the design of wall systems, mainly made of compressed earth blocks (CEB), on the indoor thermal comfort of naturally ventilated housing in hot climates of Burkina Faso. Conventional housing was modeled and calibrated using the WUFI® Plus dynamic simulation tool based on typical field surveys and the literature. This allowed testing the ability of different wall designs to impact thermal comfort. Thermal discomfort was assessed through an adaptive approach and was based on the annual weighted exceedance hours of overheating. Six designs of walls made of CEB and other locally available materials were simulated and compared to those made of classical hollow concrete blocks. The results of the simulation reveal that the profiles of thermal discomfort vary depending on the wall designs and building spaces. Thus, the wall made, from the outside toward the inside surface, of plywood of 2 cm, an insulation layer of 5 cm and a CEB layer of 29 cm thickness is the most suitable for an annual reduction in overheating for the living room. Regarding the bedroom, the most suitable wall is made of a 14 cm CEB layer, 5 cm insulating layer and 2 cm wood layer from the outside toward the inside surface.

Highlights

  • The energy performance of buildings is at the heart of policies in developed countries

  • The aim of this study was to improve the thermal comfort of houses in a hot-dry climate by using compressed earth blocks instead of hollow concrete blocks in the design of exterior walls

  • A computer simulation investigation was carried out in order to assess the weighted exceedance hours of discomfort of six designs of walls, compared to the wall made of hollow concrete blocks

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The energy performance of buildings is at the heart of policies in developed countries. Buildings consume 30 to 40% of the primary energy on the global scale for maintaining a comfortable indoor climate [2]. These percentages can be much higher in some southern countries. Showed that nearly 76% of the energy consumption in buildings is used to maintain an acceptable comfort environment. This reveals the inadequacy between the building design and the climate

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call