Abstract

Objective: The differences between the physical and mental health of people living in a lower-middle-income country (LMIC) and upper-middle-income country (UMIC) during the COVID-19 pandemic was unknown. This study aimed to compare the levels of psychological impact and mental health between people from the Philippines (LMIC) and China (UMIC) and correlate mental health parameters with variables relating to physical symptoms and knowledge about COVID-19.Methods: The survey collected information on demographic data, physical symptoms, contact history, and knowledge about COVID-19. The psychological impact was assessed using the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), and mental health status was assessed by the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21).Findings: The study population included 849 participants from 71 cities in the Philippines and 861 participants from 159 cities in China. Filipino (LMIC) respondents reported significantly higher levels of depression, anxiety, and stress than Chinese (UMIC) during the COVID-19 (p < 0.01) while only Chinese respondents' IES-R scores were above the cut-off for PTSD symptoms. Filipino respondents were more likely to report physical symptoms resembling COVID-19 infection (p < 0.05), recent use of but with lower confidence on medical services (p < 0.01), recent direct and indirect contact with COVID (p < 0.01), concerns about family members contracting COVID-19 (p < 0.001), dissatisfaction with health information (p < 0.001). In contrast, Chinese respondents requested more health information about COVID-19. For the Philippines, student status, low confidence in doctors, dissatisfaction with health information, long daily duration spent on health information, worries about family members contracting COVID-19, ostracization, and unnecessary worries about COVID-19 were associated with adverse mental health. Physical symptoms and poor self-rated health were associated with adverse mental health in both countries (p < 0.05).Conclusion: The findings of this study suggest the need for widely available COVID-19 testing in MIC to alleviate the adverse mental health in people who present with symptoms. A health education and literacy campaign is required in the Philippines to enhance the satisfaction of health information.

Highlights

  • The World Health Organization (WHO) declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to be a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on January 30 [1] and a pandemic on March 11, 2020 [2]

  • For Filipino respondents, the male gender and having a child were protective factors significantly associated with the lower score of Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R) (p < 0.05) and depression (p < 0.001), respectively

  • Single status was significantly associated with depression (p < 0.05), and student status was associated with higher IES-R, stress and depression scores (p < 0.01)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The World Health Organization (WHO) declared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to be a Public Health Emergency of International Concern on January 30 [1] and a pandemic on March 11, 2020 [2]. The first country to identify the novel virus as the cause of the pandemic was China. Two new hospitals designed for COVID-19 patients were rapidly built in Wuhan. Such measures help slow the transmission of COVID19 in China. As of May 2, there are 83,959 confirmed cases and 4,637 deaths from the virus in China [4]. The first case was suspected on January 22, and the country reported the first death from COVID-19 outside of mainland China [5]. Similar to China, the Philippines implemented lockdowns in Manila. At the beginning of May, the Philippines recorded 8,772 cases and 579 deaths [4]

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call