Impact of the atrial fibrillation better care pathway in clinically complex patients with atrial fibrillation: a report from the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry

Abstract

Abstract Background Clinical complexity is increasingly prevalent among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The “Atrial fibrillation Better Care” (ABC) pathway approach has been proposed to streamline a more holistic and integrated approach to AF care; however, there are limited data on its usefulness among clinically complex patients. We analyzed the impact of the ABC pathway in a contemporary cohort of clinically complex AF patients. Methods From the ESC-EHRA EORP-AF General Long-Term Registry, we analyzed clinically complex AF patients, defined as the presence of frailty (according to a 40-items Frailty Index), multimorbidity and/or polypharmacy. A K-medoids cluster analysis was performed to identify different groups of clinical complexity. The impact of an ABC-adherent approach on the risk of all-cause death, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and the composite outcome of all-cause death and MACE was analyzed through Cox-regression analyses, and delay of event (DoE) analyses; number needed to treat (NNT) was also estimated at 1 year of follow-up. Results Among 9,966 AF patients, 8,289 (92.3%) were clinically complex. Risk of all outcomes was higher among clinically complex patient. Adherence to the ABC pathway in the clinically complex group reduced the risk of all-cause death (adjusted HR [aHR]: 0.71, 95% CI 0.57–0.89), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs, aHR: 0.68, 95% CI 0.53–0.87) and composite outcome (aHR: 0.69, 95% CI: 0.57–0.84). Using cluster analysis, we identified a high clinical complexity group of AF patients. Adherence to the ABC pathway was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of death (aHR: 0.73, 95% CI 0.55–0.96) and composite outcome (aHR: 0.69, 95% CI 0.57–0.84) in the high-complexity cluster; similar trends were observed for MACEs. In DoE analyses, an ABC-adherent approach resulted in significant gains in event-free survival for all-cause death (Figure 1), MACEs, and composite outcome in clinically complex patients. Based on absolute risk reduction at 1 year of follow-up, the NNTs for ABC pathway adherence was 24 for all-cause death, 31 for MACEs and 20 for the composite outcome. Conclusions An ABC-adherent approach reduces the risk of major outcomes in clinically complex AF patients. Ensuring adherence to the ABC pathway is essential to improve clinical outcomes amongst clinically complex AF patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private company. Main funding source(s): Since the start of EORP, several companies have supported the programme with unrestricted grants.