Impact of the Aeolus Level‐2B horizontal line‐of‐sight winds in the Environment and Climate Change Canada global forecast system

Abstract

AbstractThe European Space Agency Aeolus mission was launched in August 2018. This satellite carries the first Doppler lidar able to provide global measurements of wind profiles. Aeolus Level‐2B products have been generated and monitored by the European Centre for Medium‐Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) in near real‐time since a few weeks after the launch. These products include the horizontal line‐of‐sight (HLOS) winds that are suitable for data assimilation in numerical weather prediction systems. This article presents a series of observing system experiments conducted over summer 2019 to assess the value of the Level‐2B HLOS winds and their impact on the Environment and Climate Change Canada global forecasts. The impact of atmospheric motion vectors (AMVs) on forecasts is also examined and compared with the impact of HLOS winds. Two datasets are used: the HLOS winds produced in near real‐time at ECMWF and those reprocessed later in fall 2020. It is found that the near real‐time data are significantly biased and should be corrected. A look‐up table bias correction based on observation minus background departures is applied to this dataset as initially proposed by ECMWF. The reprocessed data are of better quality and bias corrected using the telescope's primary mirror temperature variations as predictor. The impacts of the near real‐time and reprocessed HLOS winds on forecasts are generally positive for both temperature and wind. The impacts are largest in the troposphere over the Tropics and polar regions. The positive impacts on forecasts are larger with the reprocessed data, particularly in the stratosphere, where a significant degradation over the Southern Hemisphere is found from assimilating the near real‐time data. The normalized forecast error reductions at days 1 and 2 for the wind are ∼1.25% over the Tropics and Southern Hemisphere. The positive impact of the HLOS winds on forecasts is enhanced by ∼40% when the AMVs are not assimilated in the control experiment. The forecast error reduction from assimilating AMVs is, however, two times larger than from assimilating HLOS winds in the extratropics. Conversely, the impact of HLOS winds on forecasts is generally larger in the Tropics.